Something I have done since the early days of Covid, when the basic symptom profile was becoming clear, was keep a few packets of the anesthetic type throat lozenges in stock.
Have not had to use them yet. But still have them and replace them when past their use-by date.
Nah. They will just twist the results to something like claiming that such findings are secondary consequences of avoiding activity, of the dysregulated psycho-neuro state, etc.
Whether they can continue being successful in doing so is another question.
Chairs with arms can be a problem for me as I discovered years ago that I can relieve back pain to some degree when sitting by keeping my arms folded across my chest (it helps lock the back into a relatively comfortable position, reducing the amount of active effort required to keep it there)...
And some, like me, who can get both effects (though not at the same time, it is either one or the other). Unsurprisingly the amount, but also the type of drink consumed, are also big factors, for me.
When people say 'alcohol', in this context that needs to be defined precisely. Do they mean...
Okay, so they showed that clinicians can be more effectively trained to rote learn the unproven hypothetical model.
And the benefit to patients of that is...?
role-play illustrating empathic validation techniques
Yeah, that's how empathy works and is learned. :rolleyes:
...with a meta-analysis from 14 RCTs of telerehabilitation demonstrating statistically significant improvements...
But not clinically significant?
And on what outcome measures?
Nice work, authors. Thanks. :thumbup:
I do like brevity. :)
Also, good you got in a mention of inadequate statistical power. That is an important limitation of the Walitt paper.
Thank you.
It is a disgrace that patients have to do the medical profession's dirty work for it, and all too...
No. These guys are some of the best propagandists and political manipulators in the business.
How else have they managed to hang on for so long, with so little evidence? That was no accident.
I agree it isn't just for AI. They are just generally flooding the whole zone with whatever shit they can. Influencing AI is just a new part of the zone these days, along with social media.
Pretty sure they have the ongoing update process for the Australian Guidelines firmly in their sights...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.