A distinct effector B cell population drives autoantibody production in SARS-CoV-2 infection, Yan et al, 2026

Kalliope

Senior Member (Voting Rights)

Highlights​

• AutoAb levels track atypical memory B cell (AtM) expansion and decline upon recovery

• AtMs are precursors of autoAb-producing cells in COVID-19

• DN2 B cells drive autoAb production via TLR7/8 signaling, regulated by T-bet and XBP1

• COVID-19 DN2s resemble lupus DN2s and carry the top autoimmune risk-variant signal

Summary​

Autoantibodies (autoAbs) are linked to mortality and Long COVID, yet their cellular origins remain unclear. We analyzed the INCOV cohort and identified 12 age- and sex-matched participants with varying autoAb abundance and integrated single-cell RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data from B cells, plasma proteomics, proteome-wide autoAb profiling, clinical data, and in vitro assays. AutoAb abundance inversely correlated with neutralizing IgG and declined as infection resolved, paralleling the contraction of atypical memory B cells (AtMs). In vitro, AtMs preferentially differentiated into autoAb-producing antibody-secreting cells upon TLR7/8 stimulation. CD11c+ AtMs (double-negative 2, DN2s) in autoAb-high individuals exhibited increased TLR7 signaling, oxidative stress, and isotype switching, regulated by transcription factors T-bet and XBP1. Integrated genetic and genomic analyses showed that DN2s had the strongest enrichment for autoimmune trait heritability and inferred regulatory effects of autoimmune risk variants among B cell subsets. These findings identify DN2s as key precursors of autoAb-producing cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

 

NEWS RELEASE 28-AUG-2026

ISB researchers identify immune cells that drive harmful autoantibody responses after COVID-19​

Multi-omics study uncovers a key cellular pathway linking viral infection to autoimmune responses and points toward future therapeutic targets

Peer-Reviewed Publication
INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY


FacebookXLinkedInWeChatBlueskyMessageWhatsAppEmail

SEATTLE — When the immune system encounters a virus, it produces antibodies designed to recognize and eliminate the invader. But in some people infected with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, the immune response goes awry, producing autoantibodies — antibodies that mistakenly attack the body's own tissues.

Scientists have long known that these autoantibodiesare associated with severe COVID-19, Long COVID, and an increased risk of developing autoimmune disease. What has remained unclear is where these harmful antibodies come from.

Researchers at the Institute for Systems Biology (ISB) and their collaborators have now identified the immune cell population responsible for producing them and uncovered the molecular program that drives this response. The findings provide new insight into how viral infections can trigger autoimmune responses and identify biological pathways that could one day become targets for new therapies.

The study, published in the journal Immunity and led by researchers in ISB’s Heath Lab, combined multiple cutting-edge technologies to analyze immune responses from participants enrolled in ISB's longitudinal INCOV study of COVID-19. Rather than relying on a single experimental approach, the team integrated single-cell RNA sequencing, chromatin accessibility profiling, plasma proteomics, proteome-wide autoantibody profiling, clinical data, laboratory experiments, and genetic analyses to build a detailed picture of how B cells respond during infection.

"Our goal was to understand why some people produce autoantibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection while others do not," said ISB President and Professor Dr. Jim Heath, senior author of the paper. "By combining multiple layers of biological data, we were able to pinpoint the immune cells responsible and identify the regulatory mechanisms that distinguish them."

A Distinct Population of B Cells​

The research identified a subset of B cells — known as atypical memory cells — as the primary precursors of autoantibody-producing cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection. While these cells are a normal part of the immune system, the researchers found that individuals with high levels of autoantibodies adopted a markedly different biological program.

Laboratory experiments demonstrated that atypical memory cells from these individuals were especially prone to maturing into antibody-secreting cells that produced autoantibodies. At the same time, the researchers observed that patients with higher autoantibody levels tended to have weaker virus-neutralizing antibody responses, suggesting that this altered response may come at the expense of protective antiviral immunity.

Connecting COVID-19 and Autoimmunity​

One of the study's most striking findings was how closely the major subset of atypical memory B cells, called DN2 cells, resembled immune cells previously implicated in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus.

The researchers found that DN2 cells from patients with elevated autoantibodies showed increased activity in immune signaling pathways controlled by Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), along with changes involving the transcription factors T-bet and XBP1. Together, these pathways appear to prime the cells to produce autoantibodies.

Genetic analyses strengthened the connection. Among all B-cell populations examined, DN2 cells showed the strongest enrichment for inherited genetic risk associated with multiple autoimmune diseases, including lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn's disease, type 1 diabetes, and primary biliary cirrhosis.

“Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection can activate an immune program that closely resembles those involved in established autoimmune disorders, helping explain why some individuals experience autoimmune complications following infection,” said Dr. Dan Yuan, lead author of the study.

Beyond COVID-19​

Although the study focused on COVID-19, the implications extend well beyond a single virus.

The work suggests that infection can reveal underlying immune tendencies that, in genetically susceptible individuals, favor the production of autoantibodies. Understanding this process may ultimately improve scientists' ability to identify patients at higher risk for autoimmune complications and guide development of therapies that interrupt these harmful immune responses before they become established.

"Our findings point to specific immune pathways that could become future therapeutic targets," said Yuan. "By understanding how these cells become activated, we move closer to interventions that could prevent or reduce harmful autoimmune responses following infection."
While additional studies will be needed to determine whether directly targeting these pathways can improve patient outcomes, the researchers say the work provides one of the clearest pictures to date of how infection-induced autoantibody production begins.

“The study also demonstrates the power of ISB's systems biology approach,” Heath said. “By integrating diverse molecular datasets with clinical information and functional experiments, we were able to move beyond identifying associations to uncover the cellular mechanisms that drive disease.”
This study involved collaborative work by scientists at ISB, the University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Stanford University, Swedish Medical Center, and Providence.

About ISB​

The Institute for Systems Biology (ISB) is a collaborative, cross-disciplinary, non-profit biomedical research organization based in Seattle. We focus on some of the most pressing issues in human health, including aging, brain health, cancer, chronic illness, infectious disease, and more. Our science is translational, and we champion sound scientific research that results in real-world clinical impacts. ISB is an affiliate of Providence, one of the largest not-for-profit healthcare systems in the United States. Follow us online at isbscience.org, and on YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, X, Bluesky, and Instagram.

JOURNAL​

Immunity

DOI​

10.1016/j.immuni.2026.08.002

SUBJECT OF RESEARCH​

People

ARTICLE TITLE​

A Distinct Effector B Cell Population Drives Autoantibody Production in SARS-CoV-2 Infection

ARTICLE PUBLICATION DATE​

28-Aug-2026
 
DN2 B cells drive autoAb production via TLR7/8 signaling, regulated by T-bet and XBP1
Could there be a link between the above finding and this mouse paper?

Mechanisms of sex differences in acute and long COVID sequelae in mice
Jennifer A Liu; Sabal Chaulagain; Patrick S Creisher; Weizhi Zhong; Tianle Zhang; Maraake Taddese; Karly Shi; Han-Sol Park; Haley Hcnir; Arthur P Arnold; Ralph S Baric; Natasha B Barahona; Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi; Kevin J Zwezdaryk; Chloe L Thio; Ashwin Balagopal; Jack R Harkema; Elizabeth A Thompson; Andrew Pekosz; Andrea L Cox; Sabra L Klein

While males are more likely to suffer severe outcomes during acute COVID-19, a greater proportion of females develop post-acute sequalae of COVID-19 (PASC) despite similar rates of infection. To identify mechanisms of PASC, mice were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and viral, inflammatory, and behavioral outcomes were evaluated through 84 days post infection. Sex differences were not observed in virus replication or persistence of viral RNA in pulmonary or extrapulmonary tissues in acute or PASC phases. Following recovery from infection, female mice exhibited persistent neurocognitive and behavioral impairments, along with greater frequencies of inflammatory myeloid subsets, neuroinflammation, and dysregulated T cell subsets, including Tregs. Sex differences in inflammation and cognitive phenotypes during PASC were mediated by the presence of two X chromosomes. XX animals independent of chromosome Y presented with neuroinflammation and PASC along with infection-induced upregulation of the X-linked genes Xist and Tlr7 that regulate inflammation and chronic disease outcomes.

Link | PDF | Preprint: BioRxiv | Open Access
More discussion of TLR7 in this thread
Lupus may be an example of this sort of picture. Complement deficiency promotes lupus. At least in part this is probably because complement is needed in bone marrow to weed out autoreactive B cells. If complement is not working B cells can go out and proliferate to make plasma cells that make autoantibodies that can further interfere with complement - anti-C1q antibodies being the paradigm.

The idea is that ME/CFS depends on a different circuit but it may be facilitated by a factor associated with female sex that also facilitates lupus.

A shift in bone marrow cell output following an infection, perhaps for a period of weeks or months might make sense as part of innate immunity. I am attracted by the idea that a reason for female predominance in both lupus and ME/CFS may be the option of a double dose of TLR7 on two X chromosomes, implicating the Xist gene that is normally involved in the silencing of one X.

Maybe TLR7 expression feeds in to pathways, that may involve interferons, which TLR7 is good at inducing, that shift the cell production microenvironments in marrow to produce more of certain sorts of myeloid or lymphoid subsets. Something a bit like seasonal changes in the fish market.

TLR7 could explain the 3:1 female predominance in most autoimmune disease, I guess, through an effect on interferons that simply made B cell survival in germinal centres a bit easier, making an autoimmune clonal error easier. But lupus is 9:1 so maybe TLR7 can have another effect through another environment, which might be bone marrow. If this operates in lupus and ME/CFS, but not in most other autoimmune disease, that might explain why lupus and ME/CFS both have incidence peaks earlier on - if the effect was not directly related to accumulation of random Ig gene rearrangements and mutations over a lifespan.
Forum search:

 
Back
Top Bottom