ME/CFS and the emotional toll of persistent disbelief: from epistemic to affective injustice 2026 Walter

Andy

Senior Member (Voting rights)

Abstract​

Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a debilitating chronic illness whose sufferers are frequently met with disbelief, stigmatization, and psychologization in both clinical and social contexts. Recent work has used the concept of “epistemic injustice” to illuminate important dimensions of this problem, especially the ways in which ME/CFS patients are discredited as knowers and denied adequate interpretive resources.

This paper argues that the harms associated with persistent disbelief in ME/CFS are not exhausted by this epistemic dimension. Drawing on recent philosophical work on affective injustice, I argue that persistent disbelief can also impair patients’ affective lives in distinctive and socially patterned ways. More specifically, I argue that individuals with ME/CFS are burdened by unjust affective expectations, pressured into norm-conforming forms of emotional self-presentation, exposed to pathologizing and gaslighting interpretations of their affective experience, denied uptake for apt emotional responses, and exploited through forms of emotional labor and affective appropriation. Conceptualizing these harms in terms of affective injustice, I argue, helps to capture dimensions of marginalization that a focus on testimony and understanding alone leaves obscure. The paper concludes by considering objections and drawing out implications for healthcare and philosophy of medicine.

Open access
 
There’s also an ongoing survey by the author.



More info about his motivation for the topic:
My interest in ME/CFS is not purely academic.
Because the illness also affects people in my close personal environment, I am aware of how profound experiences of not being taken seriously, being questioned, and being devalued can be.
At the same time, the focus of this study is not on my own theoretical assumptions, but on the experiences of those who are affected.
 
While the term affective injustice is certainly part of social science/philosophy jargon which makes it kind of hard to use in everyday for advocacy or when talking to „normal“ people, I think the concept applied to ME/CFS is actually really valuable.

The definition is something along the lines of
„ Injustice people suffer specifically in their emotional or affective life, such as being denied emotional recognition, having justified Anger dismissed, or being forced to manage emotions under oppressive conditions.“

(this is what I wrote in my notes when I first found the term a year or two ago, I have no idea if I was quoting someone else or I was synthesising the definition myself so maybe attribution would be needed I‘m not sure, that‘s why I put quote marks)

Anyways, I think reading that definition this is definitely a concept that is experienced a lot with ME/CFS.
 
ME Research UK:

A paper, published in the journal 'Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy', explains that people with ME/CFS are harmed not only by the disease itself, but also by the repeated demand to justify and defend their lived experience of the physical illness, and emotionally manage other people’s disbelief.

The article explores two key concepts, epistemic injustice' and 'affective injustice', and highlights how they can cause harm to people living with ME/CFS.

Find out more: https://bit.ly/4h5GsH5
 
Back
Top Bottom