I've only recently discovered that this link www.pacetrial.org seems to redirect you to the current PACE trial info link.
...range so a lot higher than all the outcomes in the 300s in the PACE Trial so not convinced of the ceiling effect being a good excuse for the...
...Tuller returns to TWiV to provide an update on ME/CFS, the PACE trial, developments related to the NICE guidelines, and how similar practices...
...is a problem. When I first read about CBT being used in the PACE trial I didn't realise that CBT came in different flavours and assumed it was...
...M, Hawton K, Simkin S, et al. BMJ. 1996;312(7022):22-6. The PACE trial: White PD, Goldsmith KA, Johnson AL, et al. 2011;377(9768):823-36. I...
Ditto: Chris Butler: Professor of Primary Care lead the Infections and Acute Care Research Group Clinical Director of the University of Oxford...
...fatigue syndrome: an interview with Professor Trudie Chalder (news-medical.net) (nb, that link to the PACE trial info works ie www.pacetrial.org).
Trial By Error: Psych Medicine’s Non-Responsive Response to a Request for Correction of Prevalence Rates Cited in FND Paper "I have recently sent...
...It's the excellent report by George Faulkner on the PACE trial -- see posts on the discussion thread 'Government and Insurance companies -...
This is what GRADE fails on. If a study is too open to bias to be interpretable it should score zero. There is no logical justification for just...
...bias proponents of CBT and/or GET for ME/CFS (such as the PACE Trial investigators)”...
There is also this from the main PACE Trial paper in the Lancet
The PACE trial GET manuals make it very clear the PACE authors presume CFS/ME (as they call it) to be deconditioning by another name. The whole...
...the 2021 NICE ME/CFS guideline, with 43 authors including the PACE trial leaders. "given the logical incoherence of the arguments mounted by...
...of the article's misrepresentation of Tuller's work on the PACE trial. Article here Thread here Week beginning 21st November 2022 UK ME...
...that many people who support this paper do so because they have no idea about ME/CFS and have been fed misinformation by the PACE trial authors.
Because the PACE Trial had already been going a long time at that stage (it got funding in May 2003). Also the trial cost in the region of £5...
The PACE Trial used the Oxford criteria. Yet 97% of the participants who didn't have a psychiatric disorder satisfied the definition of M.E. used...
A lot of this seems of little relevance. The important parts are: the "participants with PEM" treshold for clinical trials, and the question of...
...as Nick (?) Brown being turned down. I posted about it on I think the main PACE Trial thread (or one of them). Huge hurdles were put in their way.
Separate names with a comma.
