I'd not really thought of it like that, but yes I can see the validity of what you say. Scary but valid. Presumably perceptions of survival...
Very true. Indeed it's Parker's propaganda style for the LP.
Don't forget tea leaves :).
And yet time and time again the PACE authors and their endorsers have said that GET/CBT should remain in use because "it is the best there is". A...
An alternative being, like trying to polish a turd. That glib phrase "evidence-based" yet again. Low or very low quality evidence does not...
Now there's a confession if ever there was.
It now says there are 3 replies, but I can only see 2.
A question re vaccines please. I gather the vaccines basically expose a person's immune system to either a weakened form of the virus, or the...
But at the same time we have been highly critical (correctly so) about the lack of, or extremely misguided, coverage in the mainstream UK media....
https://www.cavalierdaily.com/article/2020/12/pandemic-social-isolation-provides-glimpse-into-the-everyday-realities-of-chronically-ill-patients...
Jury's out, will have to wait and see.
Presumably if it does, then it would be best to simply xref to the new ME/CFS guideline.
But that is a post-hoc analysis, and presumably vulnerable to various misinterpretations. At this point it is just a hypothesis surely? How can...
[bold showing changes] I think my original post should have been phrased better, as above. But doesn't this still align with what I was saying?...
I imagine their top priority is to slow the rate of hospital admissions, as that is the main breaking point at the moment. So concentrating on...
I guess it's a bit like the Microsoft Windows rollout principle (tongue in cheek) - test in-house as best you can, then release to the rest of the...
Valid points. Age range 18–55, so not so vulnerable so far as age concerned. Will look further. ETA:...
Done.
But I'm not entirely sure the efficacy figure is the only valid metric, which I think only identifies those who do not develop symptoms. In my...
[my bold] How is the efficacy determined? Is it saying that the 70.4% developed no symptoms? And that the 29.6% developed symptoms but none too...
Separate names with a comma.
