Accurate detection of acute sleep deprivation using a metabolomic biomarker—A machine learning approach 2024

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Sly Saint, Feb 1, 2025.

  1. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    10,181
    Location:
    UK
    Abstract
    Sleep deprivation enhances risk for serious injury and fatality on the roads and in workplaces. To facilitate future management of these risks through advanced detection, we developed and validated a metabolomic biomarker of sleep deprivation in healthy, young participants, across three experiments.

    Bi-hourly plasma samples from 2 × 40-hour extended wake protocols (for train/test models) and 1 × 40-hour protocol with an 8-hour overnight sleep interval were analyzed by untargeted liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. Using a knowledge-based machine learning approach, five consistently important variables were used to build predictive models.

    Sleep deprivation (24 to 38 hours awake) was predicted accurately in classification models [versus well-rested (0 to 16 hours)] (accuracy = 94.7%/AUC 99.2%, 79.3%/AUC 89.1%) and to a lesser extent in regression (R2 = 86.1 and 47.8%) models for within- and between-participant models, respectively. Metabolites were identified for replicability/future deployment.

    This approach for detecting acute sleep deprivation offers potential to reduce accidents through “fitness for duty” or “post-accident analysis” assessments.

    Accurate detection of acute sleep deprivation using a metabolomic biomarker—A machine learning approach | Science Advances

    article
    Sleep deprivation can be detected in your blood
     
  2. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,142
    Location:
    Norway
    Young healthy participants with regular sleep schedules were recruited from the general public as described previously (26, 58). Participants either followed the protocol of a sleep deprivation experiment [experiment 1: n = 12 (25.6 ± 3.9 years old, one female), experiment 2: n = 11 (25.2 ± 7.4 years old, four females)], or the matched control [n= 5 (24 ± 2.5 years old, all male)], and LC-MS processing was conducted as three separate experiments.

    A total of 28 participants, all relatively young. Not quite enough to use it for anything IRL, but and interesting concept regardless.

    I wonder if the results would replicate in a larger and more heterogeneous population.
     
    John Mac, bobbler and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  3. John Mac

    John Mac Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,039
    I wonder what the results would look like in the ME population.
     

Share This Page