Hypothesis How I treat my patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CVS), fibromyalgia or “long COVID”, 2025, Comhaire

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by forestglip, Apr 18, 2025.

  1. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,065
    How I treat my patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CVS), fibromyalgia or “long COVID”

    Frank Comhaire

    Abstract
    Common to Myalgic encephalomyelitis, chronic fatigue syndrome and so-called long Covid is the panoply of complaints, with Post Exertional Malaise (PEM) as the most typical symptom. Added to that are permanent feeling of fatigue, decreased capacity to concentrate, so-called brain fog, non restorative sleep, diffuse pain, and – in case of long Covid – respiratory distress.

    Several recent studies have confirmed my original hypothesis that poor metabolism and energy production by the mitochondria are responsible for the majority of these phenomena. I have suggested that inhibition of Pyruvate dehydrogenase (Pdh) activity is the major reason for this. Pdh inhibition is probably caused by the excess of the phosphatase: Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase (PDK). The latter results from “Systemic Immune Disorder” (what I called “SID”) and inflammation.

    Based on this hypothesis I have applied oral and infusion treatment modalities which were successful in approximately 80% of 130 consecutive patients. The pivotal substances are sodium dichloroacetate, that reduces PDK, Meldonium, that facilitates intracellular glucose metabolism, and low dose Nalexone, that optimises the function of microglia.

    PDF (Journal of Clinical Images and Medical Case Reports) [Open Access]
     
    Trish, Kitty, hotblack and 2 others like this.
  2. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,065
  3. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,445
    Location:
    Norway
    So he is saying that we have studies that have proved causality?
     
    jnmaciuch, Kitty, Yann04 and 2 others like this.
  4. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,445
    Location:
    Norway
    Claiming success based on open label and subjective outcomes:
    [​IMG]
     
    CorAnd, Kitty, Yann04 and 2 others like this.
  5. Yann04

    Yann04 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,039
    Location:
    Romandie (Switzerland)
    The "long COVID" being in quotes in the title makes me feel a bit icky.
     
  6. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    58,931
    Location:
    UK
    The Fatigue Severity Scale we have discussed before on a members only thread in the context of this previous published papers about his patients.

    He doesn't seem to do any recogised hypothesis testing or statistical analysis, just presents the results in whichever way he invents to make them look good.

    As far as I can see in this article, he has just divided each person's score at the end of treatment by their score at the start. We have no idea from that how high the scores were at the start, and whether any change was statistically or clinically significant.

    Scores can range from 9 to 63. (Or from 1 to 9 if you divide the score by 7. That makes no difference to the ratio of before and after scores.)

    Let's say someone has severe ME/CFS and scores 7 on all of them, so 63 total. If they decide later that motivation is really not their problem and change the first question to 1 instead of 7. Then they score 57 at the end. Their ratio 57/63 = 0.9, which is better than the median shown on the left graph.

    Also if someone's score goes from 20 to 10 the ratio is 0.5, and if they go from 50 to 40 the ratio is 0.8.

    It's all smoke and mirrors.
     

Share This Page