January 2025 surveillance of [ME/CFS]: diagnosis and management (NICE guideline NG206)

Discussion in '2020 UK NICE ME/CFS Guideline' started by Trish, Mar 27, 2025.

  1. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    58,953
    Location:
    UK
    https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng...nic-fatigue-syndrome-15251111533?tab=evidence

    Quoting the whole statement:

    January 2025 surveillance of myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy)/chronic fatigue syndrome: diagnosis and management (NICE guideline NG206)

    We checked the evidence on dietary management and strategies and found no new evidence that affects the recommendations.

    Surveillance decision

    We will not update this guideline. No new evidence was found since the guideline was published in October 2021 that would impact on current recommendations.

    This page was last updated: 24 January 2025
     
    alktipping, Dolphin, Wyva and 6 others like this.
  2. MSEsperanza

    MSEsperanza Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,022
    Location:
    betwixt and between
    I think it's a pity that they didn't at least acknowledge the potential gap / need for clarification in the guideline with respect to nutritional support for very severely ill pwME.

    So if not added there, in view of Maeve's death, here's what I think they should have considered:

    Management of Nutritional Failure in People with Severe ME/CFS: Review of the Case for Supplementing NICE Guideline NG206 (Jonathan Edwards)

    Direct link to Qeios article: https://www.qeios.com/read/T9SXEU
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2025
    MeSci, alktipping, Wonko and 5 others like this.
  3. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    14,556
    Location:
    Canada
    Well, that sure is one way of working on problems: no research, no bother. They make research contingent on doing research. By not doing needed research, no need to do needed research.

    Technically it's correct that no new research has been done here. And it's a pathetic failure, dereliction of duty. But the dereliction of duty is so total that there's no one in a position to do something about it. It's a kind of derivation on Dunning-Kruger and the Peter principle: with people having been elevated far above their merit in charge, there is no one actually in charge to notice that no one is doing anything worth doing.

    You could seriously do an entire graduate program on this, a failure of management, of leadership, of ethics and basic professionalism. The failure is just completely off any charts you can think of.
     
    Sean, alktipping and Peter Trewhitt like this.

Share This Page