Long-Term Risk of Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Connective Tissue Disorders Following COVID-19, 2024, Heo et al.

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by SNT Gatchaman, Nov 7, 2024.

  1. SNT Gatchaman

    SNT Gatchaman Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,923
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Long-Term Risk of Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Connective Tissue Disorders Following COVID-19
    Yeon-Woo Heo; Jae Joon Jeon; Min Chul Ha; You Hyun Kim; Solam Lee

    IMPORTANCE
    Few studies have investigated the association between COVID-19 and autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders; however, research with long-term observation remains insufficient.

    OBJECTIVES
    To investigate the long-term risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory diseases after COVID-19 over an extended observation period.

    DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS
    This retrospective nationwide population-based study investigated the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency–COVID-19–National Health Insurance Service (K-COV-N) cohort. Individuals with confirmed COVID-19 from October 8, 2020, to December 31, 2022, and controls identified among individuals who participated in the general health examination in 2018 were included in the analysis.

    EXPOSURES
    Confirmed COVID-19.

    MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
    Incidence and risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders in patients after COVID-19. Various covariates, such as demographic characteristics, general health data, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity profiles, were balanced using inverse probability weighting.

    RESULTS
    A total of 6 912 427 participants (53.6% male; mean [SD] age, 53.39 [20.13] years) consisting of 3 145 388 with COVID-19 and 3 767 039 controls with an observational period of more than 180 days were included. Alopecia areata (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.11 [95% CI, 1.07-1.15]), alopecia totalis (AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.42]), vitiligo (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.04-1.19]), Behcet disease (AHR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.20-1.74]), Crohn disease (AHR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.60]), ulcerative colitis (AHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.04-1.28]), rheumatoid arthritis (AHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.12]), systemic lupus erythematosus (AHR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.01-1.28]), Sjogren syndrome (AHR, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.03-1.25]), ankylosing spondylitis (AHR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.02-1.20]), and bullous pemphigoid (AHR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.07-2.45]) were associated with higher risk in the COVID-19 group. Subgroup analyses revealed that demographic factors, including male and female sex, age younger than 40 years, and age 40 years and older, exhibited diverse associations with the risk of autoimmune and autoinflammatory outcomes. In addition, severe COVID-19 infection requiring intensive care unit admission, the Delta period, and not being vaccinated were associated with higher risk.

    CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
    This retrospective cohort study with an extended follow-up period found associations between COVID-19 and the long-term risk of various autoimmune and autoinflammatory connective tissue disorders. Long-term monitoring and care of patients is crucial after COVID-19, considering demographic factors, disease severity, and vaccination status, to mitigate these risks.


    Link | PDF (JAMA Dermatology)
     
    ME/CFS Skeptic, Kitty, Hutan and 2 others like this.
  2. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,296
    Location:
    London, UK
    I doubt this is meaningful. There are likely to be confounding factors. The conditions listed are in several cases completely unrelated but the risk ratios are all rather in the same range.
     
    ME/CFS Skeptic, Kitty and Hutan like this.
  3. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    29,697
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    I'm trying to think of the confounding factors, just for something to do - maybe a change in access to diagnosis? Maybe people couldn't get to the doctor during the first part of the pandemic, and then there was a backlog to get to specialists so as to get diagnosed with these conditions. So, all those people who would have been diagnosed in the first part of 2020 weren't, and added to increased diagnoses later.

    Maybe the people who got Covid-19 during this period had some characteristics that made diagnosis with these diseases more likely. For example, if someone had one of these autoimmune and auto inflammatory conditions but were as yet undiagnosed, maybe they would be more vulnerable to getting Covid-19.

    Maybe the people who ended up in hospital with Covid-19 underwent a whole range of tests, and those alerted the doctors to the fact that people had one of these diseases. The fact that people who were intensive care had a greater risk of subsequently being diagnosed with these conditions supports that idea (although it might also support the idea that Covid-19 illness severity increases the risk of these types of diseases).

    I don't know how many autoimmune and auto inflammatory conditions were assessed in this study. The findings would be less convincing as an indication of a group effect if there were 50 more of these disease types that actually did not show an increased incidence post-Covid.

    But still, I do wonder whether the increased incidence could be real for some of them. For example, Behcets disease, which has an AHR of 1.45 - infections have been proposed as a trigger for it.
     
    Turtle likes this.
  4. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    15,296
    Location:
    London, UK
    I am not sure why this would be a 'group effect' since a number of these conditions involve completely unrelated processes but it would be nice to see some negatives for equally unrelated illnesses that do not have the 'auto-' tag.

    I am not sure about the relation of Behcets to infection. The problem with Behcets is that in Western countries the diagnosis is more often than not likely wrong since the condition is rare and diagnosed on a syndrome of features. In Turkey and Japan the diagnosis is probably usually right because it is common there (relating to HLA status).

    I think there will be all sorts of ascertainment issues in a retrospective study of diagnoses.
     
    Hutan likes this.

Share This Page