Review Prevalence and risk factors for long COVID among cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2025, Xu et al

Discussion in 'Long Covid research' started by forestglip, Feb 1, 2025.

  1. forestglip

    forestglip Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,798
    Prevalence and risk factors for long COVID among cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Hongkun Xu, Tingting Lu, Yajie Liu, Jingqi Yang, Simeng Ren, Baojin Han, Honghao Lai, Long Ge, Jie Liu

    Objective
    The prevalence of long COVID among cancer patients remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of long COVID and explore potential risk factors among cancer patients.

    Methods
    A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from database inception until 21 March 2024, to identify studies that reported long COVID in cancer patients. Two investigators independently screened the studies and extracted all information about long COVID in cancer patients for subsequent analysis. Methodological quality was assessed using the “Joannagen Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data”.

    Results
    A total of 13 studies involving 6,653 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of long COVID was 23.52% [95% confidence interval (CI), 12.14% to 40.64%] among cancer patients reported experiencing long COVID after acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. The pooled prevalence of any long COVID in cancer patients was 20.51% (95% CI, 15.91% to 26.03%), 15.79% (95% CI, 11.39% to 21.47%), and 12.54% (95% CI, 6.38% to 23.18%) in 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up duration. Fatigue was the most common symptom, followed by respiratory symptoms, myalgia, and sleep disturbance. Patients with comorbidities had a significantly higher risk of experiencing long COVID [odds ratio (OR) = 1.72; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.70; p = 0.019]. No statistically significant differences in sex, primary tumor, or tumor stage were detected.

    Conclusion
    Nearly a quarter of cancer patients will experience long COVID after surviving from SARS-CoV-2 infection, and this would even last for 1 year or longer. Fatigue, respiratory symptoms, myalgia, and sleep disturbance need to be more addressed and managed to reduce symptom burden on cancer patients and improve quality of life. Patients with comorbidities are at a high risk of developing long COVID. Further randomized controlled trials with rigorous methodological designs and large sample sizes are needed for future validation.

    Link | PDF (Frontiers in Oncology) [Open Access]
     
  2. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,188
    Location:
    Norway
    LC defined as symptoms for longer than 4 weeks.

    Unexpected.

    Does anyone know the current estimate for the prevalence of LC in the general population?

    If anything, this might lead to some cancer funding to study LC in cancer patients.
     
  3. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    31,393
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    I'd say that maybe looks like double at each measurement stage compared to what we have seen in careful studies of post-infection fatigue syndrome/ME/CFS/LC.

    But, the data for everything to do with my statement there is all over the place and unreliable, not helped by vague definitions of everything.

    I really don't know how you would reliably separate out symptoms of LC from those of cancer and cancer treatment.

    I guess that would be good. Perhaps oncologists typically pay a bit more attention to their patients and their reports of symptoms than some other specialties do. I was surprised that the review found 13 studies.
     
  4. Utsikt

    Utsikt Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,188
    Location:
    Norway
    Better follow-up and detection of infections and outcomes? i’m assuming a cancer patient with new LC-brain fog won’t get dismissed as psychosomatic.
     
    Yann04 and alktipping like this.
  5. Sean

    Sean Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,663
    Location:
    Australia
    You must be new to this game.
     
  6. Yann04

    Yann04 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,705
    Location:
    Romandie (Switzerland)
    I’ve heard of some that dismiss many things as “stress” or “psychosomatic”. But that doesn’t change that cancer patients are some of the most well “understood”/regarded patient groups out there, it’s just that psychosomatics has infected nearly every facet of medicine.
     

Share This Page