It might be statistically significant, but the increase in meters does not seem to be imo. Having this as the only outcome makes results too susceptible to bias as people will overperform
This part surpised me however:
"We speculate that cognitive techniques,
which are reported to help subgroups of
patients, might act by modulating the
sympathetic output. If so, one would
expect a greater benefit for patients with
less ongoing immune activation and less
vascular dysregulation...
One of the better hyphophesises ive seen presented on the field. Clearly explained, and with concrete treatment suggestions. Regardless of it being correct or not this is what science should look like
Should they not spend the time finding out what Fibromyalgia is, instead of treating rats based on hypophezised disease mechanisms?
Just seems like a waste of time and money to me.
Its the same shit in different wrapping, and it was prior to Landmark getting as involved as she ended up being, and the issue with royalties is one of the reasons why they called it an "3-day-intervention" in the new project.
Its a strong ask, but I think it would have proved a lot with PEM and could even be THE study to refer to when someone propose graded exercise.
Im sure someone would agree to do this to forward the field. I probably would honestly
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.