I just checked my whisky and it's fine. (grins) The first time I see the guideline up on NICE's site, I'll raise a glass here and say a huge thanks to everyone who contributed, for all their endeavours.
I wouldnt consider seeing a neuro as from what Ive heard there are basically none that recognise ME as even existing. You could limit your consent to seeing someone who regards ME as physical not psychogenic, but you may not be able to find one.
Yes, there is a question, or set of them, in the pack of questionnaires sent out by our local ‘CFS’ clinic, which are clearly based on the assumption the patient has been seeing their doctor far too frequently, it doesnt even start by asking how many time that yeAr they have seen their GP! I...
Hmm, looking forward to the fact it's finally published, but rather dreading the loopholes they have probably put in it. The biggest seems to be the ease with which it will be possible for people's diagnoses to simply be switched to FND, MUS, etc etc. in order that the abuse can continue without...
My mother has just asked if I am going to try ‘barbaric oxygen’. Are we still expecting NICE to publish the guideline or have we given up again? Just wondering. And how can we respond to the impending tsunami of clinics changing people diagnoses in order to give them GET? Is there an appropriate...
i realise I am stating the obvious, but initially creating a fake bond of trust in order to manipulate how someone thinks should surely be called out as unethical? Shouldn’t Listening, respecting, believing what the patient says as they report their symptoms and experience, be the fundamentally...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.