Search results

Tiny sample size, no control group, Fukuda criteria, and what look like very outdated references on the background of CFS, efficacy or otherwise of CBT and so on.

If the authors' aim is for HCPs to be clearer about the diagnostic criteria for FND and thus more confident in communicating that diagnosis to patients, the logical outcome would be that they make that diagnosis less often, because they'll only be making it in cases that are unambiguous (where...

It really is. There is so much we could be finding out, right now, if the official attitude didn't boil down to "go away, calm down and wait for it to blow over".

"The biological factors in PCC, such as immune activation, might be the result of a conditioning mechanism by chronic stress" ... if we ignore all the cases in which there was no chronic stress. No need to even think about them. Just stick our fingers in our ears and sing la la la and they'll...

"few or no" is a great phrase. "Your honour, my client has committed few or no crimes."

"Further investigation and replication is warranted" gotta keep that grant money coming.

I've been a keen amateur dancer all my life but now I can't move in time at all. I guess it's the same problem as whatever it is that makes it difficult to be accurately aware of longer periods of time passing, where you can feel as if 15 minutes has passed but it's actually been two hours or...

As the authors say here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-023-00904-7

That's a lot of public money being spent on things with no evidence base.

Histamine blockers are among the most commonly prescribed things for Long Covid. If they were gamechangers we'd know it by now.

So they've found that X is associated with lower Y and their conclusion is that X "reduces" Y.

Are there any other diseases where a researcher would think it was acceptable to say they've discovered the fundamental mechanism while completely ignoring one of the disease's defining features?

what's the saying: When a measure becomes a target it ceases to be a good measure?

Infantile.

I've tried to read the paper but I'm too brainfogged to make much sense of what looks like at least partially machine-translated text. (for example) "They kindly asked participants to keep a level of vigilance at the time they recognized the appearance of signs of drowsiness or light sleep such...

They refer to the same 'three Rs' there: "Patients with long COVID have called for ‘recognition, research and rehabilitation’,23 "... Reference 23 is "Long Covid: WHO calls on countries to offer patients more rehabilitation"...

Recognition is going to be increasingly important, as fewer people even know when they've had Covid in the first place, and when they go to their GP with classic Long Covid symptoms they're ever more likely to be told it's 'just stress' or 'anxiety' and have they tried yoga? The rehab I've had...

Bearing in mind that 'Long Covid' is a term being used to cover all and any sequelae of acute Covid, there are aspects of some types of LC where various types of rehab are useful - I'm thinking about respiratory issues, or certain post-hospitalisation problems - so it does make sense to have...

also along with Munira Mirza, who was director of the No. 10 policy unit at the time when Boris Johnson was scrawling 'bollocks' and 'Gulf War Syndrome' on a briefing about Long Covid.

It sounds like a garbled version of the 'hygiene hypothesis', the idea that being too clean is bad for you, but that applies to bacteria rather than viruses. https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/is-the-hygiene-hypothesis-true