Search results

There's also the issue that the internet can bring groups of people together and make larger groups that would not have existed before. There's good money to be made going around the world giving meme based talks in echo chambers even after one has been discredited. You just keep on playing the...

I like how they claim to prefer their own paper over the Wilshire one when the Wilshire one was just anaylised according to the original protocol.

This is the funny thing, he must know that every academic, politician and scientist who has called them out over the last few years will be directly and indirectly implicated by doing such a Reuters style spin job. Surely they understand that's more people with high profiles that will stand up...

If his attempt at replication is to change the recovery criteria halfway through the trial and drop all the objective measures because you know you won't get the results you want then there has been replication. So what does that also say about the other studies previously. The justification for...

They prefer hack jobs because they know where their bread is buttered. To be honest I think most people live in a repeat chamber cocoon anyway. It's actually quite easy to tell big lies.

We have categories for such conditions and they are known as neurological and or neurodegenerative diseases. I understand that most logical people would not conclude they had a mental cause. But why would anyone bring the word mental into the overall category labelling aspect. It just adds to...

I think its pointless complaining about Liddle and will play right into his hands.

Yes but will he actively condemn him on twitter for example? The opportunity is there to condemn such behaviour and put his money where his mouth is.

They had homework for APT? It's been said before but APT isn't even what patients practice and they certainly don't use a therapist to pace themselves, who does in any illness? The PACE trial told us nothing about pacing as practised by patients didnt it?

We can tell. Its called tweeting and one does it on twitter. :emoji_laughing: I dont tweet either and its because I hate twitter. I also hate friendsbook.

So that Sharpe can bang that button instead of saying "have you read the paper"?

Wessely: So not retired from ME then as he claims to have on numerous occasions. And its so enjoyable he isn't looking to go to Afghanistan where he would be safer as he has claimed in the past? How any of his colleges cannot see through his duplicitous statements is beyond me. There are...

Is he on twitter and other internet outlets voluntarily or is someone forcing him to be there? Does he understand the notion of the WORLD WIDE WEB wherby if you are on twitter you have invited people to communicate with you? Or does he just prefer to be online spouting his voodoo nonsense...

Well it was a post full of hypotheticals. Actually I would ride off on my mobility scooter so Trish would have to play along a bit and come to the door slowly, which she would probably have to do anyway, so maybe I could "run" off as Trish shuffled to the door.

Well done Trish, if you lived near me I would pop a big bag of Haribos through your letter box for that, knock the door and run off.

Bizarre, presumably then such activities are still on the CDC recommendations list and are referred to as, "the treatments that shall not be named yet are based on sound science"?

It has to be said, he's Scottish and hes a psychiatrist, surely he's heard the C word before. If scientific critique from his peers wherby they try to explain to him that his claims require objective evidence devised by adhering to the scientific method and an alleged patient dropping the C...

Its laughable that Vogt has to quote tabloid newspapers as his truth linking to the Reuters nonsense whilst just ignoring scientific facts and trying to dispute them with actual evidence. Scientist: Why do you believe that? Vogt: ITS IN THE BLOODY DAILY MAIL!!

Yes its interesting, when was the date this tweet was published? For the whole period of Sharpes seemingly goading on twitter to attempt to collect examples of "online silencing" or worse, the best they could come up with was someone saying his professional demise will be seen as a positive once...

Its laughable that they claim we are trying to silence them when we are actually trying to engage them in dialogue. That dialogue being hampered by their refusal to release the data for their claims, amongst other things, and stifling the debate. They have silenced themselves if anything. Their...