What else does it imply? Clinically significant is a minimum threshold value. Why bother even defining such a value if you are going to then ignore it?
Sorry, I forgot. Psycho-behavioural studies don't have to follow standards, not even their own.
As a result, behavioral and neuroimaging studies of FS have revealed a spectrum of structural, functional, genetic, and neuroinflammatory abnormalities in brain regions crucial for inhibition, executive control, emotion regulation, and sensorimotor processing.
Doesn't sound functional to me.
Which is a nasty double-bind par excellence.
It is exactly the sort of fundamental methodological error that psychs in particular should understand and do everything they can to avoid placing the patient in it.
Yet they instead ruthlessly exploit it to cover up their ignorance, incompetence...
The concept of pacing is not complicated: Keep activity of all kinds below the level that exacerbates symptoms, especially PEM.
The problem is putting it into practice, for a bunch of reasons, both external and internal, primary and secondary. Plus it is just a hard learning curve even in the...
The most powerful force in the universe is not gravity, or dark energy, or entropy.
It is the ancient and lethal bureaucratic art of collation and cross-referencing. Something that computers, and now AI, have made many orders of magnitude more effective and efficient.
Brain retraining therapies:
1. Fail to use robust methodology to adequately control the variables. Primarily by relying on subject self-report outcome measures alone, to the point of dismissing objective measures as being irrelevant, misleading even. Along with selective use of evidence, and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.