@Sly Saint 94 % on the watch during the night was normal according to him. I would guess that <80 % isn’t in the normal range. I would see a...
Thank you for dealing with all of my questions! Wouldn’t the likelihood depend on the selection method, the number of participants, and the...
That seems very backwards to me. I might be too foggy to understand this now, but I still don’t get it. If you have a group of people with CF,...
No, I did not catch the «something» part.
I slept with a device to exclude sleep apnea. My spO2 was 94 % on my Venu 2 Plus, but the external measurements were fine. The doc said it was...
@Hutan I agree that methodology is the core issues. But it should also be noted that when you don’t differentiate based on PEM, all of the...
I might have misheard things, but here’s a brief summary. He starts by asking the attendees what they know about CFS. Someone said «lethargy»...
@ME/CFS Skeptic for reference:...
Why not? Power and money are potent motivators.
I doesn’t surprise me.
It’s like how lawyers or auditors oversee eachother.
I learned about it at VGS (upper secondary/high school). Might have been my statistics teacher that was very into methodology.
Which means that the choice of criteria is relevant because of the possibility of studying a non-generalizable selection of the CF population....
I don’t understand this. If the narrow population (NP) is such that the entire population fits inside the wider population (WP), then it’s still...
If these findings are replicated, it means that every ME study on POTS has to account for the origin of the ME. Which is going to be very...
A lot of people simply don’t understand the concept of scientific methodology. They believe that an opinion has the same value as evidence. This...
I would argue that the most plausible explanation of this study is that people with asthma are terrible at rating their asthma in a blinded study...
I can’t help but think that these questions should have been handled by the various associations a long time ago. I’m baffled by how...
HC had almost 50 % higher activity level compared to DC if you go by step count. They need at least activity matched HCs to say anything meaningfull.
Yeah, but what’s that? How on earth do you prove that something is cause by gut-brain interaction? That’s why I thought of FND.
Separate names with a comma.
