The Cochrane review is not being revised - it has been already been revised to say (still) that GET is effective at reducing fatigue. Cochrane...
yes, that makes perfect sense! So the "author accepted manuscript" is today's equivalent of a preprint. Trish's paper should be called a...
haha - probably! Sorry about that...
A preprint has not been peer reviewed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preprint. However, authors can post the "author accepted manuscript" on...
yes, you're right. She doesn't mention researcher allegiance at all. Which is relevant....
Bero says...."Focusing on interests such as personal beliefs, experience, or intellectual commitments can divert attention from financial...
Your excellent comment has now appeared!!! https://www.evidentlycochrane.net/chronic-pain-psychological-therapies/
Yes, exactly. Good science is about rigorously testing your hypothesis. People are just becoming more skilled at pretending they are doing that...
Thank you so much! Yes. Might tweet a version of this beautiful example if that's OK...
Thank you - you and @Snow Leopard - I was too lazy to check - assuming those two references actually supported their statement! Ironic! I will...
Oh wow! Thank you for this. I think a comment on the review might be in order ;-)
I commented on the blog, Prof Williams responded, and I responded to that....
Actually, it was easy to find this information in the review by searching on the word "excluded". I will have a closer look at the three...
I had a look at the review, and this surprise finding about four of the CBT trials which were excluded is not reported - at least not that I could...
HAve now posted a Comment on the blog https://www.evidentlycochrane.net/chronic-pain-psychological-therapies/
There is the usual reliance on subjective outcomes in unblindable trials. Because psychological therapies are delivered and usually also evaluated...
There is a non-toll link too...bit weird but I think it works https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3593.full?ijkey=DqSCPGpoZr6nehN&keytype=ref
Amazing work from @Michiel Tack as ever. I am considering writing to Cochrane to question why David Tovey decided to withdraw the review whilst...
I have had a rapid response to an editorial about the Cumberledge review in the BMJ posted https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3099/rr-2. Any...
Yes, the Alliance is going, running the PSPs, and is now under the NiHR organisation rather than under the James Lind Initiative. It's the...
Separate names with a comma.
