Continued discussion from this onwards:...
A perspective that is only relevant to unlawful clinical judgement or decision making is not a mere perspective. It is contributory to that...
Given the specifically habitual and normalised nature of unlawful clinical behaviour and administrative decision-making it is fundamental that...
Precisely There are zero contexts (outside of criminality) where legal obligations are not absolutely supreme. The remit of this review makes the...
Ignoring the illiterate is effectively a requirement of law in this context.
The Twitter thread summarises the primary points
Any organisation's work, output or guidelines that facilitates/creates unlawful consequences is either 1) to be ignored as a requirement of the...
An appropriate example of dealing with the illiterate on this basis (PG in this case): "Legally unsustainable, which your peers have zero control...
It is extremely important to remember that assuming that Cochrane, NICE, CDC or local medical processes operate in a vacuum is incorrect. Their...
Summary on Twitter: [MEDIA] The relative lack of interest in this topic is counterproductively surreal and disturbing. We have become chronically...
Profuse thanks, as always!
Continuing on that basis without those issues addressed does guarantee ongoing failure
The ministerial reply is full of inaccuracies that the post I shared addresses in full
Without this, they will do what they want, whatever that will eventually mean. They need this clarity.
Put otherwise, neither ignorance, prejudice nor willful stupidity can make unlawful policy or judgement lawful This is as central as it gets....
The applicability of the law and legal rationales
You really should share this with them too...
Are they being contacted by good orgs? Thus is entirely relevant for them: @Caroline Struthers @Hilda Bastian...
Separate names with a comma.
