We have written to them as well and it has been removed from there as well
Glad you like it!
Hoping our response should land with them tomorrow
thanks for the tag
We've had some dialogue on twitter with this group - will try and find out bit more and come back
HI there We did actually tweet about this a while ago [MEDIA] What should happen and what actually happens are obviously not the same thing!
Yes, it is of interest - I have already skim read it and shared with the other three. More in depth read planned for this weekend! Thank you
You also cannot write to respond to articles published in this journal - we tried!
thank you
[MEDIA] for the twitter feed of our response https://www.facebook.com/PhysiosforME/ for the longer version There is a lot more we could say but...
Thanks for highlighting this - we have been in email correspondence with the authors and were quite forceful back to them when they rejected our...
Are you able to point us in their direction? We'd love to make contact with them
We can only try! We are also thinking about how best to challenge it a bit more publicly if they don't respond to our follow up email
Sadly the response we received was not encouraging! We have written back pointing out the error of their ways again (more forcibly this time)...
Totally agree with this
Our survey looked at physiotherapy in general so we can't really comment on GET based on the responses I am afraid.
We're currently writing an article for our physio bimonthly magazine - which gets sent to all members! Keep your fingers crossed
Meant to say Karen was there at the conference - We haven't seen them! Trying to find out more
I was just about to post this tweet - Karen is one of the four of us!
This is a fab thread and one I am really interested in. I have a few thoughts but they are really just ideas at the moment so will watch with...
Separate names with a comma.
