Yes, I’ve not tried to register with Qeios but I have an ORCID ID which did not require an institutional email address.
Good question. My understanding is that such a change would have required authorisation from the CC. From:...
My Rapid Response has not been published, and there are still no peer-review documents on the site. The BMJ website was lagging a lot when I...
Presumably payments for goods or property would be considered 'other' payments. It seems to me that the two most likely scenarios are that either...
Just to clarify, approval is required (or not) from the CC (Charities Commission) not CH (Companies House).
I know of at least one person who has written to the CC (not me) to request the necessary information. I’m not sure if this person is working with...
From what I’ve read, Jo Platt appears to be a good choice as chair, and good that she is also chair of the APPG for LC. However, the fact that she...
I think you need to be cautious about referring to hEDS, POTS and MCAS in this context. There has been much discussion about these diagnoses on...
The history of ME/CFS certainly suggests that we would be well advised to prepare for the worst and hope to be pleasantly surprised.
This is on top of the farce of the “living systematic review” which managed to do meta analyses of single studies to produce different results...
Reading some of the responses on this thread, I would recommend that people read the consultation outcome document on the gov website. Yes, there...
Discussion starts here:...
I’ve submitted a brief Rapid Response highlighting the absence of any peer review documents and asking for that to be rectified.
It seems bonkers that it isn’t. Maybe it is just so obviously good practice, particularly when making an amendment, that it was overlooked when...
I would be very surprised if they have paid for legal advice at this stage. If a lawyer was employed to write that statement, they should ask for...
Fool’s gold standard?
Meanwhile, still no sign of the open peer review document. [SPOILER]
Video on Xitter from @PeterW in response to the statement from MEA: [MEDIA]
This article is beyond me at the moment. Can anyone explain in relatively simple terms how GWAS + WGS could tell us more than WGS alone? I wasn’t...
Really good news. I hope it starts ASAP. Thanks to all involved. Do we know who is leading the SequenceME collaboration? Relative to the disease...
Separate names with a comma.
