It would be a bad faith argument if it was a seriously expressed one, rather than simply a below-the-line howl of pedantic rage. Personally, I’d...
Toxic filth is going a bit far. He’s right to dislike the name ME on accuracy and pedantry grounds, and it’s fair enough to call it a syndrome....
https://www.tramper.co.uk/press/561247bea00324f026e278d3 List above of all public parks and gardens and nature reserves which hire or lend...
Which is why Tom is likely right to suspect there is a press release somewhere.
The problem is that the people in groups 2) and even in 3) who skim-read the article won’t be checking Garner’s position for logical fallacies, or...
The comms muppetry is such a shame, when the response they wrote was actually quite good.
The Guardian differs from other UK broadsheets in that it can be read for free online without clumsy paywall circumvention tools, so it has a...
Yes, that’s entirely true. But they do have an aversion to being on the wrong side of history, and it might be telling that this article didn’t...
Meh. That’s for Charles Shepherd, I guess. I hope he does. But I really want to know who took the call from Chalder or Garner and took the...
The Graun splash is something of a PR coup, sadly. I hope NICE’s rebuttal gets traction with broadsheet rivals - but they’ll probably spend too...
NICE were pretty robust in responding to the Graun’s otherwise uncritical regurgitation: A Nice spokesperson said: “We reject entirely the...
Article mainly sourced to Chalder and Garner, so as one would expect. Annoying that it is so prominent online. It would be better if outraged...
Okay, how about “responsive when there is a clear and uncontroversial case for minor amends to an article”. Every writer and editor is defensive...
The Graun is very responsive when there is a good case for amending an article.
I did rather like the picture of Kenneth Clarke pretending to be a zombie.
:banghead: Aarrgh. Ticks every box.
My only relevant experience has been as an expert witness in a weird professional negligence civil case that has been going on for years. If that...
That said, and to your point @JemPD , a failed case and a “post hoc sed non propter hoc” ruling could have significant negative implications for...
True, it’s not a slam-dunk. You’d only need to prove to civil rather than criminal standards, though.
By the way, this is all very well when advocating for research funding, but it strikes me as a counterproductive argument when aimed at insurers...
Separate names with a comma.
