Thanks Trish. It would be good to get some more feedback on this: would this name ('ME/CFS Science') be acceptable or not for S4ME staff? It's...
Thanks so much for all the useful comments and feedback. Here on S4ME it's 50/50 but on Twitter, Bluesky, and Facebook the vast majority does...
Should we change our name: 'ME/CFS Skeptic'? Some people said it's confusing because it gives the impression that we are skeptical of ME/CFS...
Not sure if these plasma leptin measurements are related to the proteomics analysis but here's another one that found higher levels in ME/CFS...
Leptin was also increased in plasma of ME/CFS patients in this Spanish study: Association of circulating biomarkers with illness severity measures...
The biggest differences for the NMR-metabolites seem to involve high-density lipoprotein (HDL), which also pops up in the proteomics above and in...
Trying to have another look at this paper. For the proteomics, the following seem to be the values that stand out most. I've extracted the...
Thanks @Braganca What happens if you feed it the blood, metabolites and proteomics measures that were abnormal in the recent Beentjes et al....
No, I think that was Wallman 2004. The Powell 2001 trial used the same intervention as FITNET.
Also had a look at treatments that received more than 20% negatives response and had more than 100 respondents. It's quite remarkable how much...
Found it quite interesting that ME/CFS and Long Covid patients rated treatments very similarly (although Long Covid patients were a bit more...
One caveat is that PACE is not really the trial that is driving the effect in the meta-analysis (it often found lower effects than the...
No don't think so but it took a while before it was up on the BMJ website. Maybe there is now also a delay because of the holidays?
Agree, strange that there is such a lage gap in the patient group. The relationship between both variables also looks very strong in the ME/CFS...
So the 2019 version that I had, that was published shortly after the amendment says (my bolding): While the 2019 version that is now on the...
Thanks for providing this overview. Not sure if you took this into account but I suspect that sequence A in the supplementary material means...
Yes I found this confusing. For the 2017 Apr 25 update they mention revisions from 2017 May 05, all the way up to 2019 Jun 17. This seems like...
Wasn't there some rule that if a review is substantially out of date, the editors can put a warning sign to it? Like they did with the 2008 review...
In the protocol they state it a bit clearer:
I also have a 2019 version that does not include the editorial note with a link to the update process, even though it includes all the rest of the...
Separate names with a comma.
