This paper is a complete joke and evidence for the NIH's semi-fraudulent behavior in regards to ME/CFS. If somebody would tell you to make an...
I want to say that I do know that you are a specialist in that area, I have talked to other specialists, though. (I am not even close to being a...
Sure! I am not against having better data. However, a good way to obtain the best/correct epidemiological data is to work with the CDC numbers,...
Both can be true, the prevalence numbers are for whatever reason too high and the new prevalence numbers can be used effectively by advocacy to...
Certainly not a top tier journal.
Exactly the same thing going on. 100% the same thing. I think it might not only be that ME sits on top of these symptoms, it might actually be the...
Agreed that the journal doesn't indicate 'big findings' especially as Nath delayed the whole thing by not putting it in preprint in the first...
Not so much about point scoring but gatekeeping and bias in the name of 'the real science'.
These are quite the statements by Nath, if true, especially if a pathogen is the antigen in question, I wonder how the patient commentators on...
I don't think so. The term PEM was coined in 1992 specifically for (ME/)CFS precisely because there was no existing term to describe such an...
Thank you, Simon! I see it similarly, mostly. Can we be sure we are not seeing PEM in later stages of e.g. AIDS and untreated Hepatitis C,...
Hi Frenchguy, what symptom(s) prompted you to go for another MRI, what made you or the doctor reconsider and think it could be MS? I am a very...
Moved post Has there anyone somewhat qualified ever explained why the SPECT scan results by Hyde are "no evidence"?
While that is interesting, they also probably drank a lot of Sprite, that doesn't necesarily mean that's relevant to their later ME. We should...
Prof. Hanson is fantastic! Re latent infection, I think that is a bit premature, you would expect the same "pattern" of findings in tissue damage...
Nobody should be surprised about this. It will be a similar picture in ME/CFS, despite what has been said (on this forum) about (secondary)...
I can't say more about it, only that it is true with a high degree of certainty.
FWIW, the nanoneedle could not differentiate between ME and MS.
This basically means "cell damage."
While I agree that particular end organs might be of greater importance than others in ME/CFS, I think we should think more in terms of specific...
Separate names with a comma.
