Thank you for your expert review, so it fails by the sounds of it not only by dangerously promoting the false bps model of ME but also by not...
The course reads exactly like the pacing booklet I remember getting from Action for ME 14 years ago. Boom and bust mentioned frequently and though...
Thanks @EspeMor for your reply. I hear what you are saying but can I just clarify are you saying that the MPs had information on the actual bps...
Awful, truly awful. PACE and FINE cited as evidence for GET and CBT. @dave30th, have you seen this dreadful online course content for UK GPs ?...
@Simbindi and @Tom Kindlon, thank you, will read soon as able, sounds bad as we feared. Minister Steve Brine also said ME is identified as a key...
Sorry too ill today to see if this has been mentioned today in this thread, but it looks v likely the 90 min online RCGP educational course for...
I wrote the above just after watching the debate and having missed the first bit of Carole Monaghan’s opening speech. So only until I read the...
Further to the topic on the 90 min online RCGP training course on ME for doctors the Minister mentioned in the Parliament debate today, Invest in...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Thanks @ukxmrv I looked that up earlier but obviously I can’t actually see the content, just a very vague outline. Would be...
Knackered so can’t write much but briefly thought the MP’s spoke v well overall, got across the stigma, that GET harms yet still in NICE...
Does anyone know what the content of this course is like? Thank you.
I will delete my tweet then.
Tweeted author of article, Sarah Knapton, with this info, though doubt she will reply. She has form and noticed she hasn’t tweeted about this article.
@Jonathan Edwards, sorry, no, I was just surmising as was just trying to work out the bps’s lot involvement in the Cochrane papers. Esther though...
Can I ask again what is meant when it says people like White were involved in the Cochrane review? Was he involved in the 2017 one as well as this...
I am always a bit confused when it is said White et al were reviewers on the 2017 meta analysis as I don’t see their names there? Thank you.
[ATTACH] Interesting to see Michael VanElzakker tweet this today.
Apologies too sick to read posts of last few pages, just quick reminder deciding on a definition is part of the scoping document - although of...
5 of those 17 are patient members, so so far still more bps proponents to biomedical amongst the professionals. According to Jane Colby, executive...
There were a fair few bps proponents before latest 3 new members.
Separate names with a comma.
