Given where this study comes from, at first I thought "integrated care" must be just another euphemism for psychiatry. But apparently it is a...
They seem to be moving slowly towards that. From the discussion section in the paper: It remains important to recognise the uncertainties inherent...
Definitely. 'No difference/no effect' was claimed in the abstracts of 36 (7.8%) of 460 Cochrane reviews and in the abstracts of 13 (6.0%) of 218...
Not to mention False Illness Beliefs, FIBs for short.
Yep, they set the bar high with Positive Attitudes Change Everything. Though they did have some trouble getting the actual components to fit:...
Claire Willis works at the Chronic Fatigue Research and Treatment Unit, London, UK I gave up after reading about the "good evidence base" for CBT...
Some recent info about the King’s Centre for Military Health Research where Wessely is co-director....
Nobel humour - they accelerated the award to match the discovery.
"He discovered that by combining cognitive behavioural therapy and light exercise a third of patients make a full recovery."...
"one third of our patients made a complete recovery ... a third made an improvement ... a third did not recover.” Is there a "rule of thirds" for...
Pets and their owners, eh? Dantzer was definitely researching livestock before moving on to human endocrinology.
Robert Dantzer, author of The Psychosomatic Delusion, started his career trying to reduce stress in farm animals, which meant he didn't fall for...
A useful checklist for specifying the nature and intent of trial placebos alongside the TIDieR Template for Intervention Description and...
The late 1940s through 1960s were the psychoanalytic high water mark in the USA. Were Wolff and others using (consciously or not) Freudian...
No need for another RCT, Trish, as PACE wasn't yet published. GET was just a convenient example of the uncertainty that lies within the JLA remit....
It was 2009 or 2010 when I suggested a PSP was needed to establish potential harms from GET, given the disparity between evidence from trials and...
Lewin alone called out the bad science, possibly unaware that it's primarily bad faith.
I see what you did there.
It's a rhetorical device meant to confer authority on the person who utters it.
I suspect you haven't missed the point, and summed it up well.
Separate names with a comma.
