Right, only 3/4 did the six-minute walking test by the end. There is so much to criticize. Hard to include everything in a letter. I decided to...
Who are these people who dream this stuff up? It's incomprehensible to me.
Does anyone understand how this differs from unidimensional perfectionism? What dimensions are they talking about?
And yet more research is needed because they have some indications of improvement in vague secondary outcomes.
And the WSAS is a 40-point scale. So even if the 1.5 difference for the primary outcome were statistically significant, it would be unlikely to...
I don't really disagree with this. But there seems to be some sense that no one who has a personal interest in something should investigate it...
I do have some concerns about the idea that someone with an interest in a particular intervention because they use it professionally is...
absolutely.
I don't know. but it is certainly worth a letter bringing it to the journal's attention. These people seem incapable of doing studies without...
good catch. classic outcome-switching
This seems to be what they're saying, yes.
I also don't remember this at all. Does anyone know what they're talking about?
given that she is neither the primary nor senior author, it is possible she just contributed some data or had some subsidiary role. I haven't...
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is already dealing with the previous White paper, which misreported the follow-up to GETSET. Now they are...
this is like Sec of Defense Rumsfeld talking about "known unknowns" and "unknown unknowns" and how that explained something about the violence in...
and this?
what's this a reference to?
They also don't explain why they made causal statements in the paper when they explicitly write that the study doesn't allow for causal...
Mary McCarthy famously said of Lillian Hellman that "every word she writes is a lie, including 'and' and 'the.'" I'm not going to say that about...
complete bullshit response.
Separate names with a comma.
