Not scientific then!
My issue is that this gives the BPS crowd three more years to pump out more shit just as Crawley has been doing and change the current NICE...
Art work for money.
This is true. We certainly don't want to fall into a trap. At the same time there still appears to be no provable trail to who actually said it...
And yet she still hasn't seen the error of her ways? Funny that!
Is it possible that the wording is from an email she is claiming to have received but the Times mock up was done by the journalist?
I think this is a key issue in "EBM". The gold standard is often the best scoring bullshit on a subjective, data withheld, conflict of interest...
Since I got my varifocals last year my eyesight seems to have really deteriorated. I have just bought some ready readers because the varifocals...
Separate names with a comma.
