Yes, I do accept your point here when I read the further, highly assertive, comment.
To give a bit more context I have included the preceding section as well, below. I agree it is poorly worded by NICE, and might have been...
But we are forever looking on these things from our own very specific perception. I also picked up on this little presumption of the commenter,...
Bang on. I'm really hoping this time around he will reveal his duplicity and incompetence to his peers. Anything that helps him to do that gets my...
Communication is about recipients of information gaining insights. A patent application is incredibly precise, but is virtually gibberish for any...
"especially" does not exclude everyone else! It is especially difficult for those with long covid.
I agree entirely. If the only intended audience were pwME then maybe I would agree with that. But it's not.
Good replies to SW: [ATTACH]
I agree. Far better to let clear, incisive, objective argument draw SW into making the case against him all too apparent to those who can be...
Probably better to keep everything strictly objective and impersonal, because he won't then be able to bleat to other doctors looking in, and they...
NICE themselves clarify this: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/Who-we-are/Policies-and-procedures/declaration-of-interests-policy.pdf
[ATTACH] It is if you insist on applying it to the wrong f'ing illness, where even the flawed notion of of "establishing a regular baseline" can...
As in smoking someone out.
[ATTACH] Why does it make any difference when it was written? Did doctors who were sufferers not have a lot to contribute back then? Did they not...
This is what comes to mind with SW. Could well believe he is aiming to get on the winning side re covid, but still insist he is right (as always!)...
The words themselves are not shocking. What is shocking in one sense is the effrontery of SW to make it look like he has believed and stood by...
I also thought of quite a lot of different words ;).
Nothing about blind spot. It's deliberate shape shifting to the winning side.
Classic. Arguing what his critics have argued all along, and he has never heeded. What a two faced chameleon.
The following I find encouraging:
Separate names with a comma.
