Good thread, @Michiel Tack Besides the standard stuff of adequate sample size, good selection criteria, and relevant control groups, etc, my two...
Do organic vegan lentil chips count?
They have to assert that we are pathetic incompetent wretches who fall apart at the first whiff of difficulties in life, and maybe even...
In contrast, there was no significant association between full acceptance by patients and their recovery. So the point of trying to 'change...
It isn't even randomised. What a farce.
Which is why we need some means of distinguishing between the two. Like PEM 2-day testing.
Yeah, they might want to be a bit careful about demanding new evidence be admitted to the NICE debate. Cuts both ways.
What happens if the patient doesn't 'comply' with these new health dictates? Translation: If our therapy doesn't work for you, it is your fault....
Posts moved from separate thread on the female research that is now closed. If this result holds up then it is important.
Collate and cross-reference their own words, and ye shall be rewarded. But it is hard work.
Nice work, @Arvo.
Or even 'abuse'.
They also said that when patients did not get better that they were given a different diagnosis before being sent home. How is this not fraud?...
Faulty, as defined by...?
They really don't do irony, do they. Exactly. This whole performative dance around methodology by the BPS camp is because they are consistently...
Sounds familiar. Perhaps not so new? So, not psychosomatic then?
That seems relevant. The placebo effect also does not persist. Coincidence?
It hasn't even been shown to do that. So the rest of the argument is moot.
Because it must always be stressful and demanding. :rolleyes:
Context matters. :thumbsup:
Separate names with a comma.
