Unfortunately Phil Hammond is Private Eye's 'MD', and works at Crawley's clinic.
It would be good if there was some way to have gotten a prize to someone like Robert Courtney, for his work.
That's interesting. Thanks Robert. Weird that this was the only line they corrected.
WDDTY has quite a reputation for quackery and junk-science, and there's some odd stuff and inaccuracies in there. I didn't know Myhill was a...
The minutes also include mention of concern that those in the NHS are promoting the Lightning Process. I've got some concern that the Action for...
[ATTACH] When I was looking for something else, Wessely's book on clinical trials came up, and I thought that this section could be of interest...
Thought you might be interested in this from KCL: "• 2003: £6.6M; Medical Research Council and Department of Health. RCT of CBT, GET for CFS...
Any stupid behaviour/instincts/impulses are likely to be unhelpful for ones health in some ways, but I don't see any good evidence particularly...
Good work getting in there - I think that this group is involved with some researchers who've promoted GET, so my instinct would have been to just...
@ME/CFS : Thanks for the additional info, and for being open to being contacted with further queries and suggestions. People here tend to be...
Seven years on: I bet the PACE researchers wish they hadn't written that narky letter now. I'm sure there are other examples of people who had...
Amazing that the BMJ still hasn't responded to concerns about this. What are they playing at? PS: I don't mind SEID!
That the only change they made was to the CDC sentence, when the Forward ME letter referred to far more than just that, makes me think it might be...
You could even request a copy of any correspondence with the SMC?
The SMC factsheet now says: "Updated 03/05/2018" It looks like they were contacted by the CDC? What a surprise.
He wasn't stating that the do not have ME, but he was stating that their subset of patients who fulfilled a (somewhat questionable) ME criteria...
If they want a psychiatrist on the committee, can anyone think of a decent UK psychiatrist for this? Maybe trying to encourage a good choice would...
Probably would still be helpful to have people reading them carefully, writing letters to journals pointing out the problems, etc? It is...
Some of that reminds me of claims from other research that weren't solid. Also, seems odd to present those sorts of changes (if they are present)...
If some were just interested patients, are there any issues with posting names?
Separate names with a comma.
