I am sure Ponting's response was not what SMC wanted to see. It demolishes the Stone statement and the absurd response from Sharpe et al. And why...
I am working on this issue...and doing some lobbying. I have a meeting with someone from the agency that administers NDIS tomorrow.
Actually hopefully there will be something in Lismore.
Actually, I should retract that about the Peter principle. It does imply that she has been competent to date.
Crawley's apparent promotion is clearly the Peter Principle at work.
Looking at what they did and at that statement by Chalder, it is clear that they manipulated what they said to exaggerate the claims. Given that...
whether I meant "other" or "wrong," the main point is that Australians themselves should not want me driving there!! I am happy to leave any...
To my friend Professor Edwards' points--I have to look at the hours again, but it's now 9:35 am Monday morning in SF and 3:35 am Tuesday morning...
Interesting. I do not think this BMJ Open decision will be the last we hear about this issue.
Well, and the 2016 highlight was really Alem Matthees' victory at the First-Tier Tribunal, which of course was what led to the reanalyses that she...
I hope people at Bristol have started to realize that she is becoming a liability. Universities don't usually like their faculty members to...
Thanks for flagging it. I had talked to her a few months ago. She seemed like a smart young woman. She came into this reporting really knowing...
As I wrote, I think the changes as announced are positive, and it will take some time to see how it all plays out and whether those changes are...
As you say, I think they're probably stonewalling and trying to figure out a way around it. What is there to investigate? Even if I didn't know...
Yes, I'm going to think about going this year. Last year it really wasn't an option.
Has Bristol mentioned anything about whatever "new role" she purportedly has? Bristol knows she has made false accusations of libel and has lied...
I think the issue is mainly the combination of extending the feasibility trial PLUS swapping the outcomes. If everything had been kept exactly the...
Presumably they have 20 or 40 days to appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal, I would assume. But QMUL would have to want to go through the public...
I haven't understood that point of the Cochrane reviewers--why are they saying the Likert findings are not significant when the post-hoc analysis...
They made the change because the FINE trial had found null results with the bimodal scoring but significant results in a post-hoc analysis using...
Separate names with a comma.
