My understanding is that the MRC is still working on this and is expecting that it will be available this year.
Hehe. Oops.
Thanks, Barry. Yes, I thought their quoting of the REC was very partial and indeed misleading.
Interesting. I didn't know of him, but he has a page on MEpedia. https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Gerwyn_Morris
Thread discussing paper by O'Leary: https://www.s4me.info/threads/ethical-classification-of-me-cfs-in-the-united-kingdom-2019-diane-oleary.8082/
I think it is about interpretation, so maybe you're right
I would interpret 'current' to mean that which is current, not 'the one that was current at the time the guidelines were written'.
The MRC Guide refers to the Helsinki Declaration, not to a specific version. The version of the Helsinki Declaration in force at the start of the...
Declaration of Helsinki (2004) 13. In any research on human beings, each potential subject must be adequately informed of the aims, methods,...
I think there is a difference: people say they feel better for all sorts of reasons. It doesn't mean that the treatment has been effective. On...
I welcome the apology, but really hope @Action for M.E. will revise that wording. While a minority of patients may potentially find these...
They have a history of doing that. I remember there was an editorial piece in The BMJ timed for the start of May in maybe 2015? One of my...
Separate names with a comma.
