I had to read it twice myself @Seven, because the wording can at first glance seem ambiguous. I've reworded slightly from ... "If there is no...
He does want to help ... himself. Damn I wish we could talk politics here!!! (But not really, far more important things to discuss :D ).
Sorry, can you just clarify where the '16' comes from please @Snow Leopard.
I still think (especially think) that general trends on group differences could have become quite evident during "coffee room chats" etc. In such...
A thought experiment. Suppose there is a condition, previously proven by good science, to be nigh on certain due to unhelpful beliefs in...
Whilst reading your post @rvallee the thought occurred to me of what the PACE trial would have been like had it been conceived and run by real...
One of the great things in the video is Ron Davis making the point that scientist strive to prove themselves wrong, and the more they strive to do...
Quite. Not just about listening, but the motivation for it.
The key difference being true professionalism from Rituximab trial scientist, pursuance of the truth being their primary objective rather than...
Immune system issues would not surprise me.
This is one of the key things about such folk - they don't listen, full stop.
It's all about cost saving as I see it. Drastically cut down on the obvious costs, whilst totally ignoring & rejecting any consequential costs....
What's the betting the 'evidence' turns out to be opinionated pieces by the authors themselves. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
Excellent. Small steps, but vital in paving the way.
Done, fingers crossed.
Can @Action for M.E. help here ...
See above posts of mine.
Annexes 6 & 7: https://web.archive.org/web/20040216052734/http://www.doh.gov.uk/cmo/cfsmereport/cfsmeannex6&7.pdf
This is why the annexes are not readily available: [ATTACH]
This looks like it ... https://web.archive.org/web/20040216052736/http://www.doh.gov.uk/cmo/cfsmereport/annexes.htm#annex3 Or to top of the...
Separate names with a comma.
