Hard to prove a negative. They tested their theory, and failed to find support for it.... but why give up on it just because of that!!
There are so many good and important comments made criticising junk CFS papers on pubmed commons.... not seen a single researcher respond to them.
Abstract sounds sensible... thus removing my drive to read the paper!
This is what they say about possible trustees, if anyone here thinks that they may have time to get involved:
Thanks - I remember cringing at this bit when I first read it years ago. I'd love to pick his brain on LP!
Separate names with a comma.
