Talks the talk doesn't she :rolleyes:. Doesn't it just.
Realise a post of mine in the PACE trial thread is relevant here, so providing a link to it ......
The whole document is very well worth a read (or re-read), but the following are some of the things that stand out for me. All bolding mine.
Yes, and I think that is the point. Trial participants are not themselves likely to be familiar with scientific methodologies. The primary...
Yes, with some people this is a strategy to convince how open and honest they 'obviously' are; it's human nature to warm to someone who does this,...
Pretty sure there was a comment on social media by a PACE participant (cannot remember where now though), which said they backed off from some of...
Yes ... [ATTACH] ... this cuts to the heart of it, especially for an illness that is still so poorly understood, likely has a number of...
Weird though, because when I first looked at lunch time it most definitely said the account was suspended. Only when I looked a short while ago...
Makes sense. A debate just before Christmas is unlikely to get the engagement it deserves.
From the link in post 26. Now it says the page does not exist.
Twitter account suspended?!
Yes, the BPS folk have never denied a potential physiological initial trigger condition. What will really count is what this research deems the...
Let's hope this can be trusted, given KingsIoPPN => Kings Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience.
So a 10% difference on subjective outcomes for improvement, from unblinded treatments.
[ATTACH] This is probably the best indicator of how fatally flawed it is to have the word "fatigue" as part of the condition's name. And why this...
Am I right in thinking that even those numbers took no account of the (notional) control arm results, effectively inflating those numbers still...
Although there is some validity to that, I should have thought the changes could have been normalised to a fair degree, given that employment...
No, actually when I re-read it, it is highly ambiguous! :D.
That sounds pretty significant, as well as clarifying the Cochrane issues with ME are by no means unique. Unless Cochrane buck their ideas up...
This would be the same as for my wife (the one with ME). To me what you describe fits with both what you and I say. Note I am not talking about...
Separate names with a comma.
