http://www.bristol.ac.uk/news/2018/october/day-time-naps.html The age-old adage "I'll sleep on it" has proven to be scientifically sound advice,...
Nice work. :thumbup:
Pretty good article, all up. Though the use of the word schedule might imply that we can somehow plan our way through it. Many people with...
Nice graphic, with no real surprises in the data.
Perish the thought. :whistle:
You may not have won, Tom, but I think that just shows how high the standard is in the competition. Same time again next year? :thumbup:
Has Sharpe been reading my signature?
Agreed. Doesn't need to be any more than simply asking: What is your policy on ME/CFS?
Always a good time to ask when there is an election looming (within 12 months max, more likely a lot less). By 'formally' do you mean via S4ME or...
Fair point. I was thinking in the sense of numbers of papers and influence. Certainly are serious methodological and ethical offenders elsewhere,...
I don't see a fundamental difference between psychology and psychiatry, apart from the drug prescribing rights, and I think some psychologists in...
Suggested changes in red:
This is clearly based on the presumption that it is going to happen. They are simply refusing to allow for the possibility that it might not happen.
I am guessing Bandt has been talking to Scott Ludlam, among others.
Wessely likes to point out that he has his name on over 800 papers, which is about one every 13.5 days over his 30 year career.
It seems a very blunt instrument.
Maybe they have a bad case of mammonitis?
From Esther12's link: Transparency is critical. Not enough on its own, but absolutely necessary. We have a right to both know, and criticise,...
Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days Nature 561, 167-169 (2018) doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8...
Now they are just taking the piss, to see how long they can get away with it. :mad:
Separate names with a comma.
