Like with '1984', some read it as a warning, some read it as an instruction manual.
I think you meant due to the 'load on patients'. ;)
Talking about causality breaking will break causality breaking. But I have already said too much. :eyes: :emoji_upside_down:
Acceptance of their right to be exploitative charlatans at our expense, and the Commitment to make sure it happens.
Don't you just love the absolute certainty in these kind of declarations. The beatings and whippings will continue until morale improves. :devilish:
Shh. The first rule of the Secret Causality Breaking Club, is not to talk about the Secret Causality Breaking Club.
Of course, that should be: 'CBT is competition for LP' :rolleyes:
Failure to correct demonstrable errors is a sacking offence for a journal editor, IMHO. Their damn job is quality control.
CBT is competition for LP. Phil will probably be quite happy for CBT to go down.
I don't give flying monkey's uncle what Davis's motivation is, as long as his methodology is robust.
Well said, @Hip.
Nice work. Especially the rebuttal. :thumbup:
Wessely likes to create the impression he discovered a cortisol signature, but that honour belongs to Mark Demitrack, who published two studies...
It is genuinely astounding and terrifying that this abuse has continued unabated for at least 3 decades, and shows no sign of stopping in the near...
The omertà is powerful in this cult.
This. Besides basic survival, the most important goal for us has been to get the heavy hitters in biomedical science interested.
Or they simply can't admit they are wrong and doing great harm.
I really really wish people would stop speculating in the formal literature/advice on the cause/s. Why can't they simply say 'We just don't yet...
I struggle to find a good comparison for the cognitive problems. It is like nothing else I have experienced.
They are indulging in morality plays and power games, not science.
Separate names with a comma.
