Not had time to read all of it yet @Lucibee, but looks excellent. Really does make you wonder what planet these folks are on.
ME-Pedia has some potent information about AfME. I'd really appreciate it @Action for M.E. it you would care to discuss some of these things here....
As indeed they have.
Fine. I'm reassured now. Not a suggestion as in "I think this is what is happening" but a suggestion along the lines of "Could this be a...
But email adresses are rediculously easy to spoof, to those who know how. My company is constantly spammed by very dodgy emails that have...
Absolutely. I would never dispute that.
Except that the limiting state seemed to have already been reached long before now. Edit: I see people got there before me.
April fools day.
Yep. Sounds like the comments on fb the other day of others also having to go ... is maybe underway! Especially if some are just walking ... that...
In which case it might suggest they are feeling a little uneasy/queasy and need reminding how much evidence there might be of their involvement....
Very good :)
Ooh ... :)
But that is censorship by another name.
Yep. Everything I read from people who really know @Action for M.E. does convince me there is something really wrong with them. Which makes me...
And for me too. Of all the many things that has totally screwed things for PwME it is manipulative censorship. SMC for instance, and deeply biased...
[My bold] I think if they tried that with S4ME it would backfire on them big time. We are highly aware here, and have some fantastic advocates,...
Exactly.
@Action for M.E. are actually giving an awful lot away about themselves. They are clearly capable of interacting with us (I don't imagine as an...
There you go then, he's got it all sussed. We can all go home now.
The double standard that would worry me most would be confining our scientific debates with only those we agree with.
Separate names with a comma.