My question is are Cochrane liable if patients are harmed whilst they know a flawed review is still up with a very small warning.
I think there has been previous work on blood flow through capillaries in the brain and also on the shape of red blood cells. So I suspect that...
It would be good to see the data here. What is also interesting is that there seem to be a set of measures that seem to fit rather than just one....
Isn't the question more one of is there a reliable way for them to demonstrate the safety of GET. This requires them to show that adaquate...
I think Tony is very good on these issues.
Pace did have some doctor based evaluations and I think for the CGI score they substituted in the assessors value when the patients value was missing.
The statement is interesting since it says selection needs to compare with treatments including "adaptive pacing therapy" which was a treatment...
Thanks for reminding me. I had completely forgotten. I will try to put something together tonight or tomorrow.
The RCP has the job of recruiting the NICE committee so nice to see they are good at recruitment.
Someone else noticed there was an update saying there was a note so I looked around until I found one but it took a while.
Many reviews just use published results.
That makes a review quicker as there is no data to review? Some have objective data though such as PACE has the 6mwt.
Are they open to that?
I think it depends on whether Cochrane take a short or long term view. In the short term they can cover up and brush the issues under the carpet...
There appears to be a note on the end on the full pdf now...
I suspect it is the same person as both are in Birmingham. Its very worrying reading the transcript he basically used the child protection system...
My concern would be if they have the lawyers threatening Cochrane which is the type of thing the PACE team would do or it felt like they did...
It perhaps shows the issues of charities interacting with research in that they don't necessarily have the skills to analyse the methodology....
I always thought that the best way of fundraising was to try to get regular giving so that gives some sort of predictable income. The 3-1 seems to...
I think one of the things that @arewenearlythereyet is saying is that when raising money it would be good for the fundraising adverts to be...
Separate names with a comma.
