Rather think they are digging a nice deep hole for themselves.
Many thanks @Simon M. Of course all these deliberations of improvers, be they statistically significant or clinically important, are all subject...
Does make you wonder if the fraud case would be laid open, and they are cr*pping themselves at the thought.
Is this what they've done with the data? :rolleyes: http://theprintnews.co.uk/2016/10/queen-mary-and-the-cloak-of-invisibility/
Yes, I like the way David has clarified the nonsensical now-you-see-the-data-now-you-don't absurdity, making it obvious for all to see that it is...
Brilliant indeed. Well done @Kalliope.
The ethics approval for this might be interesting. On the once hand it could be an extremely informative pilot study. On the other hand it could...
[MEDIA]
When it comes to people having been harmed as a consequence of PACE, some of those potentially most harmed are those totally unable to submit a...
Seems to me like an incredibly convenient and extremely weak excuse.
As soon as you see a 'paper' talking about their own interventions being better than a 'magic cure' ... that is the biggest tell of all that a...
That's really useful. Will be nice when we can have an education library to hold this sort of information.
P.S. We are very modest as well :).
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/0022-3999(94)00085-J
A bit like the dog ate my homework.
My thinking also. In fact it suggests that the protocol (or other document?) for any trial should include provision for how the data and access to...
And by the same token, if you are nonetheless happier to just lurk, that will be fine also.
Far from it. We all know how very hard and capably you strive to help PwME. I think "intruding" is the very last word anyone would think. My wife...
Brilliant to see you here David! :)
If they are saying that the specific data being asked for is too deeply/obtusely buried within the full dataset, and there is no longer anyone...
Separate names with a comma.
