I thought this was interesting in the TMG minutes from the 4th of november 2009 But the minutes from the previous TSG meeting are dated 29th...
It may just reflect the coming of the internet and the ease of getting new information. This goes back to the 70s in terms of papers published...
I thought the PACE day where they get all the therapists together was interesting. Is this where they get to hear what is going on in all the...
The stats plan dropped recovery as a secondary outcome. I think their claim is that the stats analysis plan replaces the protocol. There is...
Most research seems to involves a lot of hype so that may be hard.
I would read it as a statement that the analysis plan wasn't expected to override and change the protocol which appears to be what happened. As...
Interesting tweet from David Marks. [MEDIA] I think he makes an important point about passive approval of the stats plan.
In one of the early sets of minutes it seems clear that they will publish in the Lancet because they are asking whether the way they registered to...
I'm still reading the TSG minutes but its not just the analysis plan they hadn't done for the start of the trial. The database wasn't ready and...
George Monboit who is an environmentalist and guardian columnist has written a bit on the SMC...
When they were looking to raise the SF36 score acceptable for recruitment the PACE PI's understood just how subjective the questionnaires were....
I agree, I think things should move to the analysis being pre-coded so that as the last data is added to the database then the results tables...
An interesting comment on data sharing given their refusal to release data and the MRC backing up this decision in the information tribunal.
My interpretation is they dropped it as a secondary outcome in the analysis plan and then later produced an adhoc recovery definition created...
Did they select the people who wrote the editorial in the Lancet that made recovery claims based on their 'normal range'
Trial steering committee (TSG) which I believe is meant to be independent Trial management committee (TMG)
I seem to remember that the stats analysis plan doesn't raise the issue of protocol change but just introduces them. So this raises the issue of...
Sounds dodgy to me. Sounds like Kings had issues.
They have been very supportive of White and QMUL in the past so just keeping quite is good.
The pdf copy has been updated with the correction
Separate names with a comma.
