If we go to the idea of doctors basically doing what they want (or following their personal beliefs) which is what they are pushing here we end up...
As far as I remember they intended to measure school attendence and talked about access to school records but they published results based on...
Also there is no justification as to why those definitions would be a 'plurality of voices' rather that say people with ME from different...
The whole recruitment process seens a strange process in terms of a random mix with no assessment criteria ever being published so we have no idea...
I don't understand why anyone would say there is a need for agreement and unity. There is good and bad science and that is what needs to be...
They are really relying on peer review to say that quality is achieved. One issue here is that peer review goes to such a small group of people...
The thing that worries me is lots of people attribute improvements to stuff they are trying at the time and perhaps don't report on the things...
And he is talking about 'individualized' rehabilitation as being safe which is concerning especially with Greenalgh involved. [MEDIA]
The figure would be 0 as they have no concept of what may be questionable
I think Rand were trying to male money on it so that could be the reason. I've also come across invited talks that don't get published as they are...
I do find it shocking that they don't seem to have stopped to think through the argument they are making and whether it is sound. It just seems...
I think metrics are also driven by citations so a bad study that gets cited as a bad study can help an academic.
My criticism isn't of her but of the appointment of someone who is so involved in cochrane onto an independent advisory group. As well as the...
But the editor is unrepentant at the error
Putting a cochrane loyalist on an independent advisory group doesn't make it sound very independent. But given this seems to basically be people...
Its not just that they are poor quality its that they aren't linear hence the maths that cochrane is applying is simply wrong. It doesn't make...
For some in the UK it is since the requirement seems to be to keep certain eminent people happy.
I don't see why it is radical to dismiss unreliable results and yes they should be removed from other reviews as well. I think from a review...
Link...
10 weeks also implies that the follow up is very short. We know from CBT and GET that they have short term effects on the questionnaires which...
Separate names with a comma.
