It may, or, equally, may not be of interest that rheumatoid arthritis was mentioned by Arthur Cott in 1985 in the Context of "hurts" versus...
Yes. Pilowsky's 1969 AIB was defined as "the persistence of an inappropriate or maladaptive mode of perceiving, evaluating and acting in relation...
Precisely. Unless they are being much more clever than we can imagine, which seems unlikely, the whole basis of this needs close scrutiny.
"If the doctor told you he could find nothing wrong with you, would you believe him?" I only ask because this seems to be a question on the...
That "uniquely" provides scope for different interpretations.
Like others I am having difficulty reading these papers and will need to look again. That is not a criticism. You know what we are like. However...
Ah, but his specialty (EDIT is) infectious diseases, and he has chosen the realm of psychiatry.
I have not yet got very far into this , and I don't want to be picky, but there seems to be some uncertainty in respect of Waddell's formative...
Has he ever indicated at what point in his recovery he was fit to return to work? That must be a key point in recovery. One would imagine it must...
Did he supply the title? Probably not. It was probably the sub-editor's task. But what does "recovery is possible" mean.? It could seem to mean...
It reminds me of the original 1959 paper by Acheson, where he said something to the effect that there would undoubtedly be cases arising in the...
I tend to agree but I think the "Wessely school" has been used for a long time. Was it initiated by Margaret Williams? I prefer...
I don't think it can be right that Aylward introduced Wessely to BPS thoughts. The two letters in the National Archives from, from memory, 1992...
I find it interesting that David Marks appears not to have found reference in the works of the WS, Waddell and Aylward to Arthur Cott and his...
In the book there is a rather interesting footnote to Arthur Cott's paper on p85. The model, procedures and data presented in this paper were...
Probably people who did not keep up with the times in their views of Eysenck.
Can we be sure that "multidimensional" is not also intended to apply to "health"? Perhaps we do have multidimensional health.
The linguistic problems seem odd. "May" indicates conditionality. Surely it is incumbent upon researchers to indicate in what conditions it "is".
It does seem strange that ME is being discussed in these terms when what might have been the germinal paper on the subject, published in 1986,...
Well, it worked for Darwin didn't it? Oh. No. I forgot. It didn't.
Separate names with a comma.
