Nice! Another journal should be publishing a similar correction soon, also with Professor David as senior author.
I haven't read the paper. Are the researchers seeking to expose this sort of priming as a concern?
Maybe that Crawley study was criticized because it violated multiple rules of scientific research?
this was a huge problem in the CBT study she published last fall with Sir Simon.
No, the Highlights "correction" was in the GETSET paper. I included a separate item about the GET safety paper. That hasn't been corrected. I've...
yes, the CODES trial. I wrote a few posts about it:...
was this because of her public tweets about this issue?
Actually, the decision by the ethics committee in Norway against the proposed LP study there basically referenced this sort of bias as a reason...
It's very irritating that Sharpe still does this and keeps repeating the same criticisms of others over and over again. And yet in Fiona...
I like this. Or maybe "treatment-induced cognitive bias"
I haven't read all the posts in this thread so someone might have focused on this point already. In addition to encouraging people to re-interpret...
But NEM firmly defends its decision. It seems like a done deal now.
I noted that sentence in particular. I haven't seen the evidence that this is what happens, nor does she provide it. What is this claim based on...
It's not odd at all. Many medical journals have beefed up news and other non-peer-reviewed sections on their sites that do not need to be written...
No, I never heard back from her. It is an interesting turn-around, although whether it is apparent or actual is hard to assess. It would help if...
I hadn't come across this. it's an infomercial i guess
I have been repeatedly described this way--including in a BMJ news article. With my academic credentials omitted.
What student wouldn't benefit from such mentorship?
Yes, but the investigators only interpreted the expectations before people started the interventions, so they conveniently didn't include that the...
Interesting theory. They later claimed at some point that they didn't mean to claim that PACE was "definitive," and that they'd only said...
Separate names with a comma.
