I think this 2016 articles gives some background about the authors:...
Good point, don't think so, no. Should reread the papers to be sure. But I suspect that one can assume that patients receiving a ME/CFS diagnosis...
I found it interesting that in the 2015 report in PLoS ONE, they mention that the responder group had an impressive number of steps per day:...
I can't remember that episode. Can someone direct me to a link? Many thanks in advance.
The Guardian’s Science Weekly podcast and the Cochrane review Yesterday, the Guardian’s Science Weekly podcast published an update of its episode...
I've tried to write a short blog post about this: "The Guardian’s Science Weekly podcast and the Cochrane review."...
[MEDIA]
Does anyone have it stored or perhaps only the complaint by Bob?
Does anyone have a version of Coyne's blog post about Robert Courtney's complaint and what information was given in it? I can't seem to find it....
The Cochrane review was never removed. If you don't know the nature of the complaint than perhaps you shouldn't do a podcast accusing Cochrane...
How do you know authors have to pay to get published in this journal?
ME Action posted this message on social media: [MEDIA] "Researchers, patients and clinicians are invited to submit a manuscript for consideration...
IMHO, I don't think that is really necessary, as there are already large and effective organizations in the UK an the US that fund ME/CFS research...
Copied post I think this study just shows that self-reported diagnosis of CFS is not very reliable. It does make me wonder who all those people...
I think this study just shows that self-reported diagnosis of CFS is not very reliable. It does make me wonder who all those people are that...
Ok thanks. I've sent mine two days later on Tuesday. I'm hoping that 500-word limit isn't a reason to ignore my complaint.
Thanks Adrian. Can I ask when did you send your complaint? I've also sent one (with more than 500 words because it's nearly impossible the...
Don't think so. I usually respond if I think there's something really misleading in the results, that might confuse readers. Don't think this is...
55% were currently working but if I understand correctly, this includes patients who worked part-time, did casual work or are a student....
Ahh. So I was late by one day? Frustrating. I did manage to fill in all the forms, so maybe they might get the nomination after all. I hope so.
Separate names with a comma.
