I wonder whether “wheelchair-dependent” is actually better here. It seems to suggest it is less of a choice, that someone needs it. With...
-- I don't think it's necessarily good that they all think they will make a full recovery. For example, it means they may not make good/informed...
An example of how they don't criticise the participants:
They don't really explore different time periods. For example, the time before getting a diagnosis versus after getting one.
Not particularly interesting perhaps, but she said these 2 things:
The review history is here, though I didn't find it particularly interesting on this occasion:...
There were quite a number of P values less than 0.1. And some less than 0.05. So there were other differences between the groups, though the...
I have heard it is now. ;)
Useful enough. However exertion can also bring on symptoms one wasn’t dealing with before the exertion.
NIH?
Though thinking about it, other illnesses don't have such crashes so maybe it is useful as sometimes people with the illness can have such...
This thread includes data on survey results on people's preferences:...
I don’t like “crash” except for the worst instances of PEM/whatever. There are lots of instances of PEM/whatever that I wouldn’t call a crash....
Indeed there were quite a number of sympathetic researchers and clinicians who were not psychologists or psychiatrists in the group who wrote the...
For all the rhetoric about the name in the ICC (and ICP), a lot or most of the authors use ME/CFS (and sometimes CFS alone). Also ICC was not...
Discussion of the ME-ICC
Separate names with a comma.
