So it really sounds like a vacuum word, used simply because a correct term has not been agreed on. Bit like how fatigue is used to cover every...
Unfortunately, they don't even trust their own research findings and no one makes them so they will completely overlook those negative findings...
Wait. Sick people ARE sick?? No way. It's almost like inventing a fake category of "things we don't understand yet=fake" is as a bad idea....
This is obviously ridiculous. Why are ridiculous statements so common in medical research? Are these people not aware that most people don't...
Is that supposed to be it? This is the "correction"? Which they specifically framed to misleadingly suggest no harm rather than no benefit? Which...
I'm genuinely surprised they made something out of it at all instead of pretending it doesn't matter. I fully expected this to be overlooked...
Definitely not just in England. GPs in England ‘failing to recognise thousands of long Covid cases’...
Abstract Background: Long COVID describes new or persistent symptoms at least four weeks after onset of acute COVID-19. Clinical codes to...
Is there a good general one? I've seen some variations of... immune-mediated, immunological or something like that, but they aren't typically used.
Same with CODES. Saw it a few times recently, generalizing CBT to FND. Without rationale or justification either, and of course ignoring the null...
[MEDIA]
Uh, never noticed that. But those are just passing mentions hinting at a question that is not specified. And another one of the mentions calls it...
That's something I noticed that is actually one of the biggest red flags. Typically, scientists argue. A lot. And disagree with each other. A LOT....
You're right, this isn't good old D-K, it's a special case of Mass Dunning-Kruger. Which ironically manifests through socially spread beliefs...
I'm getting a sense that inflammation is being used generically to mean something the immune system is doing simply because there is no better...
It's really getting hard to avoid the conclusion that a disease that resolves itself naturally in most cases is basically medicine's worst-case...
Followed by the usual: "no difference in outcome between treatment arms but in-group benefits in secondary measures of blah-blah-blah". I have no...
Good old Dunning-Kruger. Edit: correction, it's a special case of Mass Dunning-Kruger, not the good old singular type.
That's odd, not a single GET trial even had any mention or consideration of PEM, they literally don't believe in it. Should be done in a split...
Separate names with a comma.