Search results

  1. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    A bit of listening from the NIH would go a long way, certainly on the EEfRT a) they got the EEfRT "effort preference" research wrong. b) the term sucks and doesn't describe ME. Some of the brain and hand grip findings are interesting, in my view. But why use "effort preference", which the...
  2. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    I think it might be – based on how authors responded to letters about the Pace trial and similar. Those criticised ignore all the strong points and focus on more marginal ones. if there are a few marginal points across several letters, or in a paper, that makes their reply can look stronger...
  3. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    I think it is a great example of the power of the crowd, even when it is a crowd as ill as this one. Yes - and the graphs! Thank you for the great narrative.
  4. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    Brilliant analysis and data presentation from @Murph. Perhaps just as important, these patients keep trying despite many near-miss failures - that surely suggests they are trying VERY hard (because they nearly succeed and seem desperate to do so). Which is the opposite of what is suggested. By...
  5. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    Thank you for this analysis. I've always had a thing for making graphs easy to understand and would like to make a couple of suggestions (without considering changing chart type): 1. The paper consistently uses red for pwme and blue for HV and think we should stick with that for % hard...
  6. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    Thanks for running the GEEs - and yes, I completely agree. I think the participant exclusion is flawed but not that relevant because the 65% hard-task completion rate for PwME (thanks for running that analysis) shows the test was invalid for use in this study. Game over.
  7. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    I've not read this, but it might answer some of the questions being raised about EEfRT and how it was used Statistical analysis of effort expenditure for rewards task Following the analytic strategy described by Treadway15, generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to model the effects...
  8. Simon M

    Deep phenotyping of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2024, Walitt et al

    “His research protocols focus on deeply phenotyping persons with disorders characterized by aversive symptoms that develop after exposures, such as infection. Currently, he is working with patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Gulf War Illness (GWI), and...
  9. Simon M

    Deep phenotyping of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2024, Walitt et al

    Thank you for doing this, the results are reassuring. Are you able to share the data?
  10. Simon M

    Deep phenotyping of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2024, Walitt et al

    Thank you, @Paddler for taking part in the study and for sharing your experience. What an ordeal. As ou say, their hypothesising has drawn attention away from the main point of the study. I didn't know that about the study interest in interoception and it forming part of Wallit's (job?) title...
  11. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    Just seen this - great work. I think it is exactly what we would expect: EEfRT raw data analysis by @bobbler Minimal difference on 12% win probability tasks where easy tasks are more logical Likewise 88% win probability tasks were hard tasks are more logical Significant though not massive...
  12. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    In case this hasn't been shared already:
  13. Simon M

    Muscle Fatigue during Dynamic Contractions Assessed by New Spectral Indices, 2006, Dimitrov et al.

    @Hutan posted from it: Further studies are needed to fully establish the validity and reliability of the new spectral indices for testing muscle performance in the clinical, rehabilitation, and sports setting. So, a tiny study, not validated, least of all for comparing ill vs healthy. Wallit...
  14. Simon M

    Grip test results and brain imaging in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    This is very important for interpreting results. It's a tiny study. I don't think a meaningful comparison of HV vs patients is possible for a complex pattern like the Dimitrov Index. I suspect any conclusions based on the difference are not statistically valid. Correction: the figure says it...
  15. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    To be fair, it is designed to fatigue healthy people (that is the effort, the cost), but it is explicitly designed not to exhaust... ...precisely. That's easy - the term was coined for the new paper while silently repurposing a reward motivation test as an undefined 'effort preference' test.
  16. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    A couple of points I left off my 'final' post: @bobbler quoted Treadway saying that men were more likely than women to choose hard tasks. The HVs had a slightly higher male ratio - I wonder if the study allowed for that? The marginal 0.04 p value for hard choice ratio being lower for ME folk...
  17. Simon M

    Deep phenotyping of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2024, Walitt et al

    I think there might be 2 things going on here. 1. Effort preference, which means nothing and is a null test for the study population. 2. The separate rather odd fadings about lack of central fatigue (as shown by transcranial magnetic stimulation), which might mean something. I haven't read this...
  18. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    My head is spinning and I'm going to bow out of the EFFrt discussion. Here's what I think I've learnt from others' helpful posts (and quotes from the underlying papers): 1. EEfRT was developed to probe anhedonia (an inability or relative inability to experience pleasure, presumably the rough...
  19. Simon M

    Use of EEfRT in the NIH study: Deep phenotyping of PI-ME/CFS, 2024, Walitt et al

    Does the EEfRT test mean anything when used on PwME vs healthy volunteers? Thanks to @bobbler for digging out so much useful information. I'm afraid I bailed out after reading ten pages of printed posts, and haven't reached the end of this ever-growing thread. My thoughts so far: Comparing...
  20. Simon M

    Deep phenotyping of post-infectious myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, 2024, Walitt et al

    edited for clarity I think that at an online conference a couple of years ago, Workwell said they had data on about 400 subjects. I don’t understand why they haven’t published an analysis of al their data, which would go a long way to clarify the significance of these studies. At that...
Back
Top Bottom