Search results

I really don’t mind if it’s incompetence or corruption, it’s for the Charities Commission to work out. Amendments agreed at meetings held illegally don’t hold anyway, so for NR’s sake let’s hope he can prove appropriate notice was given in 2014 for the AGM. It wasn’t in 2024.

Fascinating. I’d like to think also about the intersection with capitalism but my brain isn’t playing.

I think the CC needs to be informed of all of the issues, which includes the “movement” article, the non-apology, the “I am Complaints Officer” article, the attempts to add the motion to the AGM by Nic? The ultimate refusal to do so, the format of the AGM, the emails to P White and threatening...

I’m going to dump some ideas, then elaborate a bit later Link - The Essential Trustee, what you need to do. Guidance by Charity Commission. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-essential-trustee-what-you-need-to-know-cc3/the-essential-trustee-what-you-need-to-know-what-you-need-to-do...

I would just take the whole sorry tale to the Charities Commission and let them look into it.

Because they haven’t a clue what they’re doing. Hope that helps.

Archived https://archive.ph/VyYrF

This is undated in the FAQ’s the FAQs also contain hyperlinks to the AOAs (version I saw had the “permission of CC” included 28 c

Ah so Martine is the only person I can see who works in Ainsworth and Wells, and she has a PR background but her company was used to do campaigning work, and it was at arms length. She’s the director and the only shareholder. And in 2014 and 2015 her company had only debts showing on their...

Oh wow that’s big money, I withdraw my lack of interest. This looks terrible.

To me, a foggy bystander with a charity work history, I don’t really care if the wrong thing was filed. I don’t really think there was a conspiracy to pay cash to trustees which they don’t “deserve”, they probably did carry out work and should be paid. what I do care about is 1) the attitude of...

Well the complaints CEO has been hoist with his own petard, hasn’t he? Egg on his face.Other English sayings for destroying himself, embarrassing himself, looking a fool also apply. Removed any doubt that he’s unsuitable for the role he is currently undertaking.

5k

The wording is a bit Weasel words. “the charities commission “accepts” the current version.

Neil Riley is a lawyer

As Neil is a lawyer, maybe they could pay him to carry out the work? :laugh: He does not like people questioning his authority, does he.

How many names are on that petition now :bored: 1410 it seems

If we can rename the pertinent documents after cartoon characters, and set out which is which, and then just explain that Bugs Bunny was on the website until 2014 then Donald Duck was on the website….and Riley said they follow Bugs Bunny but that’s wrong because… then I could probably follow...

The whole behaviour about this is “notable”. need to look at the code of conduct

Well I guess the only way to settle this is to ask the Charity Commission to see what their records show. might be worth doing some archiving of webpages too. Also a look for the old webpage on the way back machine?