Search results

Not to mention wondering just what was the point of the whole MUS/PPS/BDS/etc exercise in the first place, if the end result is simply returning back to their starting point? :mad::mad::mad:

Because he can. Quality control in this area of medicine has completely broken down.

:inlove: ––––––––– Thread reader version: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1287525539859910657.html

Moved from the how to make a mask thread.

When it is all about the marketing, you don't have a good product.

Quite the folie á deux Gerada and her husband are performing. They are a powerful argument against power couples.

Support family in withdrawing from caring role Fucking savages. :mad::mad::mad:

It's the God of the gaps for medicine.

IIRC, even Wessely conceded years ago that CFS wasn't a form of depression.

Don't you just love his utter certainty. That cannot is doing an awful lot of lifting in that sentence. Just one word missing: known. Add that, and everything changes: But if he conceded that then his argument would disappear up its own fundament.

The Maths of Contagion: Why Things Spread and Why They Stop (The audio and video go out of sync, but it doesn't matter as the talking head is just a small box in the corner. Plenty of good clear graphs and graphics.)

Indeed. This kind of research tells us far more about what is going on in the minds of those doing the diagnosing than the minds of those being diagnosed. It is so distinct and persistent a phenomena it needs its own entry in the next DSM.

I have some polar bear repelling rocks, and I have never seen a polar bear around here. This has nothing to do with the fact that I live near the equator.

I reject your non-explanation, and substitute my own non-explanation. :rolleyes:

And neurological disorders/brain tumours/strokes/heart disease. Etc. The functional disorders claim rest entirely on the assumption that there is no underlying biological pathology. How they test that to a safe level has yet to be explained.

Satisfaction was high. Patients were relieved they didn't deteriorate?

Maybe I missed something, but the 'BPS model' seems nothing more than the unoriginal idea that to best understand and control X, we should take into account all the significant causal factors influencing X.

Have not been following mask design, but this one seems a good fit.

The observed fall..., I presume.

Good interview. "But you never know on any given day what is going to be too much [activity]." Especially early on when learning about it all.